Too right I'm serious:
"on this it also had a section for females. i'll give you an example.. day 1 weight = 55lbs + 4lbs for carrying rubberised diemaco, and then in the adjoining section women 25lbs + rifle and so on...
now although the only woman we saw at senny were chefs and med staff, i did ...
Share This Page:
Search found 7 matches
- Wed 15 Mar, 2006 11:33 am
- Forum: Army Joining & Training
- Topic: women on selection
- Replies: 44
- Views: 12776
- Tue 14 Mar, 2006 2:45 pm
- Forum: Army Joining & Training
- Topic: women on selection
- Replies: 44
- Views: 12776
- Sat 11 Mar, 2006 7:02 pm
- Forum: Army Joining & Training
- Topic: Boots for Selection
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11335
- Sat 11 Mar, 2006 6:57 pm
- Forum: SF Joining & Training
- Topic: SBS (Reserve)
- Replies: 25
- Views: 17253
- Fri 10 Mar, 2006 11:14 am
- Forum: SF Joining & Training
- Topic: SBS (Reserve)
- Replies: 25
- Views: 17253
- Fri 10 Mar, 2006 11:12 am
- Forum: Army Joining & Training
- Topic: Boots for Selection
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11335
- Thu 09 Mar, 2006 7:46 pm
- Forum: Army Joining & Training
- Topic: Boots for Selection
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11335
mmm... Danners- very heavy. And expensive. I can't think of anyone wearing them on my course. In fact I can't think of any one wearing them for the last 5 years.
Hanwags- better- but still got a fair bit of weight in them. Probably the most popular boots about at the moment. Excellent quality, as ...
Hanwags- better- but still got a fair bit of weight in them. Probably the most popular boots about at the moment. Excellent quality, as ...