Share This Page:

  

Iraq - Time to go?

General Military Chat. New to the forums? Introduce yourself, Who are you and where are you from?
Post Reply
mfat_man
Guest
Guest

Iraq - Time to go?

Post by mfat_man »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6046888.stm

Brave or foolhardy comments? To me he's come public because Blair and his cronies just won't listen to common sense anymore :x

The way it's going at the moment the country will fall apart and the security risk to the region and us in the future.... Of course I am 100% behind our lads but surely the time is coming when we really need to decide when to call it a day and not blindly follow the yanks!
xcj
Member
Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue 19 Sep, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by xcj »

I dont envy the people who have to make the decision, either way they'll be criticised.

Half of me says they need leave asap because its going nowhere, damage limitation in effect. The other half of me says well, we made this bed so we need to lie on it until its comfy.

If we pull out, the problem is who takes over. It'd obviously be the Iraqi's but theres so much division of opinion that its a non starter - the authorities dont have the support, nor do they have the power to do anything about the lack of support/militants. It'd be absolute mayhem... however it already is mayhem.

Its tough... and im willing to bet big anthony bliar is wishing he was nothing to do with it. You can see how much strees he's under every time he makes a speech. I suppose if you live by the sword, you die by the sword
Stinky
Member
Member
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue 17 Apr, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: South Somerset (Yeovil)

Post by Stinky »

If the Iraqi police and soldiers have been trained enough to be able to control the country by them selfs then yes, I think they should come back to stop the gay people complaining about our soldiers going to war. But then if the soldiers arn't going to be helping anywhere else in the world they should get a little break and then sent to Iraq again.
mfat_man
Guest
Guest

Post by mfat_man »

Stinky wrote:If the Iraqi police and soldiers have been trained enough to be able to control the country by them selfs then yes, I think they should come back to stop the gay people complaining about our soldiers going to war. But then if the soldiers arn't going to be helping anywhere else in the world they should get a little break and then sent to Iraq again.
Stinky

I can't even react to the shite you come out with at times. At least take the time to read before you post. The General says;

""I am still a dad as well as being Chief of the General Staff. I wouldn't send an army where I wouldn't send my own child."

Does that not say something to you about the state of affairs, or would you rather we just sent soldier's coffins home?
User avatar
AJtothemax
Member
Member
Posts: 1672
Joined: Mon 20 Nov, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: U.K

Post by AJtothemax »

8) Too fecking right!

Glad to see someone who still holds what is right in their heart actually speak out for a change.

Amen.
AJ

"First with your head and then with your heart. Don't stop."
ali_hire
Member
Member
Posts: 644
Joined: Thu 14 Dec, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portsmouth

Post by ali_hire »

As most others have said it's a no win situation, I don't envy Blair at all for having to make the decision, but on the other hand he brought it on himself. At the end of the day it's his job to make these kinds of decisions and take the flak when he gets it wrong. Could I do any better? Would I have made the right choice? Almost definately not, that's why I'm not a politician.

If we pull out now £££millions wasted as well as the lives of all those brave men and women, job not even half done.
But on the other hand what do you do? Stay there for another 5, 10, 20 years? Who knows how long it will take, how many more lives it will cost and how many more millions it will cost the taxpayer?
Aways look on the bright side of life.
darrenrugby18
Member
Member
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu 06 Jul, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Portsmouth/CTCRM 935 troop

Post by darrenrugby18 »

Something that annoys me about the Iraq situation is when you hear about British or American troops killing 'innocent civilians' in crossfire, or in bombings etc etc. But the fact is if the civlians pulled together and didnt harbour the militans and actually helped our boys out, there wouldnt be any more civilian deaths. In a sense the civlians are making life harder for themselves, the longer they help or ignore the militant next door to them the more needless deaths will happen.

When they complain about our troops being there and get all up in arms about it, that fact is we're there for THEIR benefit (and im pretty sure that the average bootneck or squaddie doesn't wanna be puttin his balls on the chopping board from some ungrateful foreign twat who would rather point a gun at them rather then help) but they aslong as they can't manage themselves they'll always be a need for a foreign military presence.
CTCRM - 935 Troop
Stinky
Member
Member
Posts: 1033
Joined: Tue 17 Apr, 2007 4:10 pm
Location: South Somerset (Yeovil)

Post by Stinky »

I didn't mean it in a bad way and I don't want soldiers to die. But I didn't think about our soldiers not wanting to risk their lifes for the Iraqis.
User avatar
Jame4rs
Member
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed 11 Oct, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: New Malden- Surrey
Contact:

Post by Jame4rs »

If the Iraqi police and soldiers have been trained enough to be able to control the country by them selfs then yes

Stinky quote^

From what i have read it seems like there not, i read one article in the Mail saying "the Iraqi soldiers are cowards, the minute a gun fight bursts out they run away, these men are far from the warrior status they are renound for". (something along those lines, not sure word for word)
Post Reply