9/11 BLACKOUT ON TV & RADIO

[peter7]

I have never ever been a conspiracy theorist...always steered well clear of them. A few months ago I watched Loose Change for the first time. It was pretty damning. This made me do my own research and I really looked into every angle.

So much just does not add up. The lack of debris at the pentagon, pensylvania, the speed and way the towers fell and also that 3 fell not 2.

Recently a top danish scientist found an explosive material normally usedin controllde demolition. He's been on Danish TV and the report on Youtube has 250,00 hits. Why is is that UK press, tv and radio refuse to even mention this???

Is it that bad finding out the truth?

The whole event comes to London if anyone is interested.

http://www.exploringevidence.co.uk/

[EagleEyes]

You've gotta be shitting me

[Wholley]

the speed and way the towers fell and also that 3 fell not 2.

Erm...The World Trade Center had TWO repeat TWO towers.
Trade seven,a five storey building also collapsed after the event killing a very dear friend of mine.
The Danish person has been trying to make a name for himself for quite some time with his"theories"All of which are complete bullshit and have been proved to be so.
First of all why would"A Top Danish Scientist"be snooping around ground zero when we have enough scientists of our own?
Your barking up a dead tree,or your just barking.

[rc]

Sorry to hear about your friend Wholley.

Building 7 was a 40 + storey sky scraper containing CIA / FBI offices (as well as various others). Anyone who believes that building came down due to damage caused in the 'attack' is deluded. It was almost certainly a controlled demolition.

There's certainly more to the events of 911 than we are aware of.

Rich.

[Wholley]

The part of Trade seven which did not collapse was indeed imploded,a week after the event(the four storey's that were left)
I was seconded to fly up to Manhattan with a bunch of other senior deputies from the southern states to assist New Yorks Finest on 9/13 having been called back from vacation in Charleston SC.
I never got to go but spoke to some who did.
They,like me and most American's with any kind of sense will NEVER forget.

Barack Hussein Obama can suck up to the muslims as much as he wants provided he realises he will be a one term president.


You call forty storeys a skyscraper?Where have you been living,Norfolk?

[rc]

The part of Trade seven which did not collapse was indeed imploded,a week after the event(the four storey's that were left)

Not sure if we are talking about the same building here ???

WTC 7 came down in what looked like pre planned, controlled demolition shortly after (within hours) the twin towers came down. The official version claims it was fire damage - very unlikely, have a look at some of the videos on youtube.

As far as I know there was nothing left of WTC 7 to be demolished a week after.

Rich.[/b]

[Wholley]

The heat generated by an av-gas compressed explosion is easily enough to melt steel.
Both aircraft that hit the towers were almost at capacity which was the point.
Thanks to Bill Clinton the FBI and CIA were no longer allowed to disseminate intellingence and share what they knew.
If you want a consiracy theory look no further than Clinton and his acolytes.
The CIA and FBI offices in trade seven were purely administrative as FBI HQ is at Quantico VA.And the CIA's HQ is somewhere else

[bored_stupid]

WTC 7 came down in what looked like pre planned, controlled demolition shortly after (within hours) the twin towers came down.[/b]

A quick question for you but how do you think tall buildings normally come down? If the foundations collapse and the building looses integrity then the forces which effect the building as it falls are the same whether its a controlled demolition or not. So just because it looks the same as when you see cooling towers destroyed doesn't necessarily mean its controlled.

As for the youtube videos, I watched a documentary which convincingly debunked all those and pretty much every other conspiracy theory including the one about the BBC reporting the fall of Tower 7 before it actually collapsed. It's a shame I can't remember what it was called as you could have tried to find it online.

Anyway all I have to say to anyone who comes up with the suggestion the Towers were rigged to explode is this........Do you not thing that, in a building were upto 70,000 people worked, at least one person would have spotted the (quite literally) dozens of men drilling holes and planting demolition charges (including the miles of det cord needed) in order to bring the place down around them as they were working???

To be honest though its pointless discussing these types of things as those who believe them do so because they subscribe to Agent Mulder's adage of "I WANT to believe" and so they do!

[potatan]

Something I read just the other day, debunking the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.layscience.net/node/124

[gunner75]

I must say iv seen the collapse of the said building and it does look very 'controlled'. In my line of work I sometimes come across demolition jobs and upon viewing it does look like the mid section uniformly freefalled before the outers therefore falling into its building footpint i.e 'controlled'. However im not one to believe this to be the case. For people to say that a conspiracy created the events of 9/11 I'd say it would be almost impossible to do and Im 110% certain that it wouldnt remain secret - there would have to be hundreds, if not thousands of people involved in some way shape or form. With that in mind Id say that with people being people, someone somewhere down the line sooner or later would reveal something major about what happened. At the end of the day an aircraft almost fully loaded with fuel slammed into the top of the tower, the resultant damage had knock on effect damage to itself and other buildings.

[flighty]

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/EnemyWithin.html

Gore Vidal is not a bloke to be ignored.

I've posted this link on here before and Wholl, I know you are to the right of Ghengis Khan and I am to the left of Arthur Scargill so we will never agree.

Makes for interesting reading.