Share This Page:

  

BOEING VS BAE the X Planes

"Flying High" Discussions about the Royal Air Force.
RAF Mancunian
Member
Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue 15 Jul, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: North Manchester and RAF Brize Norton

Post by RAF Mancunian »

I did'nt see the programme, but I think the jet is the Joint Strike Fighter, produced by Martin and Lockheed. However, the RAF and RN, are still getting it as well as the USAF US Navy. For more info go to the RAF website, equipment, aircraft, and then to the section at the bottom which says Future Requirements :angel:

Hope this helps

Adam
Rick_Von_Maester
Member
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun 18 Jan, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by Rick_Von_Maester »

The competition is not between BOEING and BAE, but between BOEING and Lockheedmartin. If i remember it correctly, BAE was just a sub contractor for lockheed (there is also a German, and Canadian sub contracting for BOEING). I dont think the Americans would've trusted another foreign country to build its fighter/bomber jets for them.
User avatar
Aldo
Member
Member
Posts: 1146
Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Great Britain - Middlesbrough

Post by Aldo »

They got an RN air wing bod in to test out the VTOL capability too. Great plane, and we're getting 150! It's a pity the MoD won't go for the C varient though :(
BAE was just a sub contractor for lockheed
BAe was 15% of the total project, mostly in the VTOL area of work, without BAE's experience with VTOL it's likley that Boeing would have won because lockheed wouldn't have been able to get the VTOL done in time. All the others in the contract came in after the design was finished (we came in in the middle) so only have about 1-5% of the final contract.
"This far and no further" - Britain, World War 1 & 2
Mr Grimsdale
Member
Member
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2004 2:18 pm
Location: Kingston

Post by Mr Grimsdale »

Stuff all this stealthy computerised nonsense.
The RAF should never have got rid of Lightnings and Phantoms! :lol:
User avatar
Aldo
Member
Member
Posts: 1146
Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Great Britain - Middlesbrough

Post by Aldo »

Stuff all this stealthy computerised nonsense.
BAe's design for the next generation RAF UAV :D

Image
"This far and no further" - Britain, World War 1 & 2
Falkens
Member
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 28 Jan, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by Falkens »

Lightenings no, Phantoms yes.
User avatar
chunky from york
Member
Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri 13 Jun, 2003 10:12 am
Location: york, england

Post by chunky from york »

Regarding the Nazi research into flying saucers, as I understand it, from various satellite Chanel's. The technology was given to de Haviland in Canada, they spent a lot of money on the project but got nowhere.


It may have been part of a plot, but they spent an awful lot of money on misdirection.

Personally I subscribe to the 'cock up' theory of history. :D :D
Chunky from York



I may not be the man I was, but I was
Discodayryder
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat 10 Jan, 2004 1:28 pm
Location: South Wirral

Post by Discodayryder »

Might try that with my mum’s cat!

I really don't like Lockheed Martin after what happened with the starfighter.

I wish Boeing would have got the contract but the X-32 just isn't up to it. It would be a shame to scrap the design. I'm sure with more development it could be put to good use and they've learnt allot from the programme. They are ahead in the race to develope a UCAV. Does anyone know what they plan to do?

The X-35 is a brilliant aircraft; it's got to be said. :-? It really out-performed the X-32 in all the tests.
Discodayryder
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat 10 Jan, 2004 1:28 pm
Location: South Wirral

Post by Discodayryder »

Didn't read the second page! Ooops... :banghead:

Sorry
Post Reply