(note: The SAS and SBS are currently at about equal strength, 250-300 men each. That is though a relatively recent increase from what Rabby said)
This, in my opinon, is dreadful news. The only glimmer of hope (albeit a rather blindingly big one

) point is that such an increase would probably be impossible, so (I hope) the information must be wrong. Given the length and depth of training, it would be a huge strain on manpower (though after time thee would be ore men available to train), wich I doubt the SAS would accept. On the other hand however, 2000 men does look like something else. There has been much more said about a possible SF support unit akin to the US army rangers in role, so that may be what this is about. I would have thoughtthe existing elites would be able to do this, but perhaps with their conventional conflict comitments they don't have the manpower? I especially say this as buffHoon tried to double the strength of the SAS when Afghanistan was still in open warfare, but the idea was successfully blocked by an angry 22 reg.
If however, what the article suggested is the gospel truth, then I would estimate the average quality (and thus capability I might add...

) would plummet, at best to about the level of the BPT/pathfinders, or at worst, a US ranger.
That said, there is another possibility - the SAS does become a 2000 man force, but is reoganised with a more specific role (or perhaps have greater individual specialisation) sort of like the US army special forces (green berets), meaning in that particular role they maintain high effectiveness to a general SF standard. However, we maintain the tradition UKSF capability by forming a new SF unit much like our current ones, so at the end of the day, we still have SF and an elite specialist infantry unit, but the SAS name just ges handed down from SF to elites. I that makes sense
