Page 4 of 4

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 7:33 am
by Whitey
All white Englishmen should be allowed to carry a firearm, why not? If you really are against it, to hell with it, swords then.

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 12:55 pm
by hc00
Whitey wrote:All white Englishmen should be allowed to carry a firearm, why not? If you really are against it, to hell with it, swords then.
Haha if they tried to push that through the house of commons there would be an uproar from the ethnic groups.

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 4:24 pm
by Whitey
Let the ethnic groups roar, all they can do. If they try and riot and attack Englishmen, let them smell English powder and feel English steel.

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 4:35 pm
by harry hackedoff
Hell Whiteboy, that`s a great idea :P
How you been mate :-?
Missed your sorry arse around here :wink:
Sorry that I ain`t checked you boys out in a while but I know you`se all going from strength to strength there Whiteboy :wink: .
Don, you might like to check out a thread by Anglo Sexual on the Retreat forum. It`s all a bit "urban myth" to me, bro. :wink: Get the guys to give it their verdict :P :roll:

Sempers and Per Mare :drinking:

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 5:36 pm
by Whitey
I saw that about a year ago, I don't know if it is anything but propaganda?
Too well written to be a lone grunt Marine imo.
I agree with his view on the weapons 100% though b/s or not.
I was at the range a few months back and was hit in the lower left abdomen with a 9mm richochet. The only thing I got was a slap, sting and a purple bruise. Had it been a .45 cal. I'd been in the hospital or dead.
I agree to a point with the M-16, but I know Army soldiers don't clean their weapons for shit nowdays as well. I never had too many problems with my gun, only times I did was when I let it get filthy or wore out a spring.

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 6:20 pm
by Doc
Ive been away apparantly, cant really remember all abit of a blur. Apparantly qualified to save lives again.

Anyway, chappy you were bang out of order to stand your ground on such a thread, and you were wrong. I wont quote all the stuff just you were wrong.

I havent heard the proper story as yet, but my condolences go to the family and her oppos.

Arm them, and for training they could cure the prison overcrowding issue.

Posted: Mon 21 Nov, 2005 6:40 pm
by sneaky beaky
I agree that all police should be armed.
Trouble is - that the current lot of Police, are not geared to being armed and might be totally unsuitable to handle even a handgun.
It will take a recruitment drive to take suitable people into the Police and THEN train them to handle firearms as a matter of course!
Then we would be in a USA type of Police Force!
Is that good or bad? Only time will tell.
Sneaky

PS Bring back capital punishment, especially for the killing of Police Officers, but for me - for all sorts of murder!

Posted: Tue 14 Feb, 2006 5:02 pm
by Dogwatch
I am resurrecting this thread following the shooting of yet another unarmed female officer, this time in Nottingham last night.
My prayers go out to Rachael and her family.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nott ... 711268.stm

My personal feelings remain the same as the early pages of this thread, the circumstances are largely the same as the Bradford incident, ie unarmed officers attending a call as did hundreds of others last night all over the country.

Posted: Wed 15 Feb, 2006 7:57 pm
by sneaky beaky
I can only emphasise my last post. With double the emphasis.
Sneaky

Posted: Tue 04 Apr, 2006 12:01 am
by rambo19
Guns banned in the UK. Gun crime gone up.

You should get 25yrs min for carrying an illegal gun. period.

Arm all the police? the one's joining now are a bunch of letfty's, they might shoot people from the contryside alliance but not real criminal's.

Ready for anything.

Posted: Sat 08 Apr, 2006 10:42 am
by scottishcammy
What planet are you on Rambo you twat? I am a cop and you're talking out your arse. Lots of us are getting inujured/shot/killed and stabbed putting ourselves at risk to save members of the public....then you come out with a completely ridiculous statement like that, thanks a bunch. You haven''t got a clue mate.

Posted: Sat 08 Apr, 2006 10:46 am
by Doc
Rimbo fark off ! :evil:

Any further posts from you and I will delete them as and when.

People please avoid replying to this plank (I know its hard as the veins pop out of your neck!), but dont flame the fires that this idiot is trying to light.

Rambo your days...hours even, here are numbered.

Doc

Posted: Sat 08 Apr, 2006 12:47 pm
by Si Capon
A bit harsh I feel. In this diverse world in which we live, everyone is entitled to their own opinion or so I am led to believe.

Posted: Sat 08 Apr, 2006 3:08 pm
by Wholley
As this has been resurrected,
I'll stick my two cents in.
This in no way represents my Department or the views of the current incumbent.
It is purely my point of view.
Since the banning of handguns in the U.K. and Australia(Some long guns in OZ)Criminal use of firearms has increased.
New York and DC have seen firearms abuse increase as those states have extreme firearms control laws.(Yep Frank,Before you start,I know DC is not a state,But it may as well be)
In the 48 states that have enacted"Right to Carry"Violent crime involving the use of firearms,Mugging's and home invasions have dropped,Sometimes by as much as 50%.
WI.andIl. have no"Right to Carry"And are seeing their crime rate rocket.
Want to commit a violent crime with a gun?
Just move to NYC,D.C.WI,or IL.
Or England. :o