How is that supporting him?if there are other issues beind the review then that is extremely poor for the individual concerned. Especially if he's a serving officer......he should be a better man than that
I've been an NCO as well. We were bordering on an interesting disucssion about PTSD and then just attack me. I didn't read the book, I never said I had, I was talking about wider issues. Don't you think you should read peoples posts before (without NVGs) pointing the finger?
I've had alot of support via PM by Royals for not being a sycophant and I appreciate their honesty. They should not apologise for views expressed by others though, as honourable as their sentiment is. At the same time I cannot apologise for the actions of some idiot Para at this year's March. I can certainly deplore such an idiot but he's disgraced himself, I cannot, unfortunately, change that. You cannot label all people in the same way though.
I'll have a beer with anyone and never sit there calling people idiots.
You think I'm an idiot????? Fine, I thought you might appreciate a serving officer's input into your march amongst what generally seems to be a fine group upholding the spirit that both I and SYB allude to. Obviously not. I'm dissapointed that I got it wrong. I'm no upper class prat, I've worked bloody hard to do this.
I think SYB (regardless of the book, good or bad) has raised the issue of PTSD and made some excellent suggestions. I am an open minded man and think that this is an important issue. Ratso, I'm sorry, I think you've completely lost the point of this and are criticising me for being an officer and especially being in the Army. You talk down to me as much as you feel comfortable with.....and don't call me son.
I defended the Royals a while ago as I said I've never been talked down to by an RM but have been by the Paras. I'd hate to change that view.