Share This Page:

  

Insoles = slower?

General Military Chat. New to the forums? Introduce yourself, Who are you and where are you from?
Post Reply
chris7011
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 26 Mar, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: britain

Insoles = slower?

Post by chris7011 »

Just a quick question, I wear insoles in boots and trainers and they seem to do a good job of reducing impact damage from running.

However, it seems reasonable to assume that the extra cushioning dissipates energy that could be used to propel you forward faster.

Is this the case? Would it be worth removing insoles when you are racing or on a time trial?
jimbob
Member
Member
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu 13 Apr, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Glasgow

Post by jimbob »

when i did my 1.5 mile run on the treadmill without my proper training shoes my shins were killing me afterwards and i believe thats what strted my shin splints, for some reason i seem to be more flat footed on a treadmill than i do on ground, i would just stick to what you wear just now
Greg The Great
Member
Member
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun 05 Mar, 2006 6:43 pm
Location: At the bar

Post by Greg The Great »

I remember the first time I ran with Sorbathane insoles, it was noticeably harder going.

I agree with the above posts though, I don't think removing them would make a vast amount of difference once you're used to them.

Greg.
Never chop wood in a rubber dinghy.
lewis
Member
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 7:04 pm
Location: Loughborough

Post by lewis »

In my experince insoles such as superfeet, and 'proper' prescribed insoles, are more about placing the foot in its optimum position, rather than providing more cushioning. This prevents injury and I popable doesn't impede performance. Shock absorbing probably do waste energy on the otherhand.
Post Reply