Share This Page:

  

"10 green bottles standing on a wall..."

General discussions on joining & training in The Parachute Regiment.
Post Reply
4of10
Member
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed 01 Jun, 2005 7:02 am
Location: Wimbledon/Pennines
Contact:

"10 green bottles standing on a wall..."

Post by 4of10 »

Perhaps this is incredibly naive of me but what could the purpose of a "Tri-Service" battalion be?

Okay, let's assume that Matelots could be needed on certain SF missions - we can't be looking at a large number of them. RAF guys, too.

The coxwains that drive the Bootneck Rigid Raiders are *Marines* - not Seamen. How about the Landing Craft coxwains - Marines, too?

Marines flew helis in the Falklands, didn't they?

As for RAF, we have the Army Air Corps so I can't see a real need for RAF guys being needed, unless we're to capture and fly off with Osama Bin Laden's hidden fleet of Migs.

Booties work well enough with the army. If we're looking at SF dedicated RN/RAF units, we already have it, don't we?

If "Tri-Service" people are needed for intelligence interpretation, that's a waste of effort for the men concerned. And how many women are going to join because of "Equal Opportunities" legislation? :x

None of this makes any sense to me.

If I put on my cynical "politics head", I can easily see some sense: cut back on ABF and humour everyone by "creating" a new unit to appease critics. As soldiers we all know the obvious: technology cannot replace the organic seeing, doing, thinking "machine" operating a rifle/MG and holding ground. I don't think any politician who has no military experience should be allowed near the job of Minister of Defence.

David Stirling created the SAS from nothing. The Paras were formed after the successes of the German Fallschirmjagers - for the same purpose. The Commandos were created inspired by Boer Kommandos (initially) to raid the nazis. All were created by serving or previously served soldiers. All had a clearly defined purpose.

Why not expand the SAS/SBS? Introduce a "Ranger" platoon/company in PARA/CDO battalions?

So what's this "Tri-Service" SF unit precisely for? A unit created by politicians with one eye on their purse is hardly a good idea... :evil:

Because the politicians have seen that the army can still (just about) cope with the Iraq (mis)adventure, they think that they can afford to cut back. They cut back on those who can't challenge them. They'll never cut back on their (overpaid) wages and expenses. I think our own politicians are as much a threat as the terrorists - if not more. :(

The politicians would do better to get Paul Daniels to train up a new military unit that could conjure up Weapons Of Mass Destruction or Iraq-based Alqaeda training camps. Blair would like that a lot!

I think someone's been watching the "A-Team" on UK Gold...
User avatar
Hostage_Negotiator
Member
Member
Posts: 1186
Joined: Wed 08 Jun, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Stick a pin in the map!

Re: "10 green bottles standing on a wall..."

Post by Hostage_Negotiator »

4of10 wrote:
As for RAF, we have the Army Air Corps so I can't see a real need for RAF guys being needed, unless we're to capture and fly off with Osama Bin Laden's hidden fleet of Migs.

...
And just how many of your your Black cladded Imperial by the Grace of God SF Stormtroopers are you going to fit in that LYNX exactly?
"When you men get home and face an anti-war protester, look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend, because she knows she's dating a pussy."
4of10
Member
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed 01 Jun, 2005 7:02 am
Location: Wimbledon/Pennines
Contact:

Re: "10 green bottles standing on a wall..."

Post by 4of10 »

Hostage_Negotiator wrote:And just how many of your your Black cladded Imperial by the Grace of God SF Stormtroopers are you going to fit in that LYNX exactly?
Reading between the lines, why would RAF Herc aircrew need to be trained as SF? You see my point, don't you? If someone could explain the major benefits of a "Tri-Service" SF unit, I'm keen to read why. The gov plan just makes absolutely no sense, militarily, to me.
"No Camera - No Combat!"
oldie
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat 25 Jun, 2005 1:38 pm
Location: collie

Post by oldie »

Quote 4of10

David Stirling created the SAS from nothing. The Paras were formed after the successes of the German Fallschirmjagers - for the same purpose.

The SAS were formed from the original parachute brigade you twat learn your history
Guest
Guest
Guest

Post by Guest »

You show Waltor...I mean 4of10 (wink wink) whos boss oldie.
WALTER! :D
42
Member
Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri 16 May, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: midlands

Post by 42 »

gen mike jacksons way of keeping his beloved paras safe
42
Member
Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri 16 May, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: midlands

Post by 42 »

before you start, not a dig at the paras
User avatar
Maroon
Member
Member
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon 10 May, 2004 10:13 am
Location: Herts

Post by Maroon »

Hardly!!! If it goes the way the Govt want the Regt will lose a battalion to Hereford..... :cry:

Why don't they just turn PF Plt in to a Battalion sized force with a Platoon always attached to 16 AAB. As it is, they are Tri Service.

4of10, TRI SERVICE means exactly that, for 22 to recruit the best from the Marines, RAF Regt and any other part of the 3 services. Most Herc pilots that are use by SF are to certain extent SF trained.
"Every man an Emperor!"
sd88
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon 08 Aug, 2005 1:04 am
Location: Lincs

Post by sd88 »

The SAS were made from nothing in that they were not actually anything to do with the paras, its just that Stirling chose to take men from the Para Reg.
window
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun 31 Jul, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: south

Post by window »

"The SAS were formed from the original parachute brigade"

Thats probably why he wrote that then, not meaning to be funny mate but if the men from the parachute regiment were chosen to be used as the sas then surely they were formed from the original parachute brigade,

:wink:
To take it literally that is.
User avatar
Sully
Member
Member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon 14 Jan, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Chatham

Post by Sully »

I thought the original unit (L Detachment) was drawn from "Layforce" - No.8 Army Commando with whom Stirling had previously had a spell. Stand to be corrected though.
Per Flank, Per Tank
Post Reply