Share This Page:
SAS Vs SBS & UKSF Vs USASF
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu 21 Mar, 2002 8:00 pm
- Location: Liverpool
SAS Vs SBS & UKSF Vs USASF
Alright.
I'm not like a big expert on the armed forces so don't start nagging if I ask stupid questions or my facts are wrong. I know loads about the SAS from books I've bought, stuff on the telly etc. but I know hardly nothing about the SBS. What are their major roles, what do they usually do in campaigns, stuff like that.
Also I want to know who is the best. I've heard I few people going on about how the SBS better, but the SAS have the good reputation. I've also heard that they hate each other, is that true.
One last question, who is the best SF unit in the world. Are we well better than the American ones.
I'm not like a big expert on the armed forces so don't start nagging if I ask stupid questions or my facts are wrong. I know loads about the SAS from books I've bought, stuff on the telly etc. but I know hardly nothing about the SBS. What are their major roles, what do they usually do in campaigns, stuff like that.
Also I want to know who is the best. I've heard I few people going on about how the SBS better, but the SAS have the good reputation. I've also heard that they hate each other, is that true.
One last question, who is the best SF unit in the world. Are we well better than the American ones.
The real names Gareth. I want to join the royal marines in the future.
You can't really say who is better UKSF or USSF. The U.S. has such a big military it has specialised it's SF troops i.e. Rangers speciality is attacking hardened positions, "Delta"'s is hostage rescue, Army SF (Green Berets) speciality is the training if foreign guerrilla elements.
Because the UK is so much smaller and ,as Defiant said, has alot less funds to pump into it's military, it cannot specialise it's SF troops to such an extent that the U.S. can. As a result the SAS and SBS have a very wide ranging type of mission profile, both SAS and SBS conduct long range recon, counter terrorism and other types of missions that the U.S. has different units to do.
All I can say that if I were a country that had no SF troops and I was offered to choose any unit in the world I wanted I would choose the SBS [i'm joining the marines
], simply because I would know their personnel could take on any type of mission, instead of just one "specialised" role.
I'm by no means an expert but have read ALOT of books on the subject
-Steve C
Because the UK is so much smaller and ,as Defiant said, has alot less funds to pump into it's military, it cannot specialise it's SF troops to such an extent that the U.S. can. As a result the SAS and SBS have a very wide ranging type of mission profile, both SAS and SBS conduct long range recon, counter terrorism and other types of missions that the U.S. has different units to do.
All I can say that if I were a country that had no SF troops and I was offered to choose any unit in the world I wanted I would choose the SBS [i'm joining the marines

I'm by no means an expert but have read ALOT of books on the subject

-Steve C
- Gearjammer351
- Member
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri 18 Oct, 2002 11:05 pm
- Location: Surrey-originally Dallas
- Contact:
Delta Force
Col. Beckwith,founder of the Delta Force,in his book explains how he was inspired while serving in an SF group participating in an exchange program,and working with the SAS.Upon returning to the states he petitioned the army brass and said of the SAS 'those guys can do anything-we need a group like that'.The SAS was not only his inspiration but the model he used,and though Delta(like the SAS) does counter-terrorist work they also do the other things that the SAS does.They are very similar in thier role and capabilities-by design.I wouldn't try to compare them as I have never served with either- I just wanted to point out that counter-terrorism is not all they do and that they are probably more like the SAS than any other organisation.
For those who have had to defend it, liberty has a flavor the protected will never know
I am by no means an expert.
Read a lot, searched a lot etc...
SAS/SBS have a long history and invented much of the methods used today.
Personally I like to think the SAS is most versatile, winns in adoptation to events, are broadly trained and the caracter of the "boys" plays a big role as well. :fadein:
Besides,
SAS started in 1941
Seals in 1962
Delta 1978 etc.
More on this on my SAS site
Read a lot, searched a lot etc...
SAS/SBS have a long history and invented much of the methods used today.
Personally I like to think the SAS is most versatile, winns in adoptation to events, are broadly trained and the caracter of the "boys" plays a big role as well. :fadein:
Besides,
SAS started in 1941
Seals in 1962
Delta 1978 etc.
More on this on my SAS site
Cheers, Huub
[url=http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas]Visit my SAS site[/url]
[img]http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas/me150.jpg[/img]
[url=http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas]Visit my SAS site[/url]
[img]http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas/me150.jpg[/img]
- Gearjammer351
- Member
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri 18 Oct, 2002 11:05 pm
- Location: Surrey-originally Dallas
- Contact:
Hey Huub,
I like a man who can admit that he doesn't know everything,that is uncommon,as I say I have never served with either group.The Delta Force is very secretive-they don't even have a badge,so I don't REALLY know much other than what I've read.I once served with a guy whom it was rumoured had been in Delta,but he wouldn't comment.I know that the SAS doesn't care for publicity either so reading about them doesn't really tell their whole story either.The service record does speak for itself though and what I do know about them is very impressive,and I would not criticise them.The US and British military trains together a lot and I know that we share many things.I know better than to turn this into an argument so I'll leave this one alone now.By the way great website-I browsed through it some and I'll definitely look at it some more when I have the time.
I like a man who can admit that he doesn't know everything,that is uncommon,as I say I have never served with either group.The Delta Force is very secretive-they don't even have a badge,so I don't REALLY know much other than what I've read.I once served with a guy whom it was rumoured had been in Delta,but he wouldn't comment.I know that the SAS doesn't care for publicity either so reading about them doesn't really tell their whole story either.The service record does speak for itself though and what I do know about them is very impressive,and I would not criticise them.The US and British military trains together a lot and I know that we share many things.I know better than to turn this into an argument so I'll leave this one alone now.By the way great website-I browsed through it some and I'll definitely look at it some more when I have the time.
For those who have had to defend it, liberty has a flavor the protected will never know
Txs Gearjammer351,
I did have some contacts with ex- and members and they support most of my sites content.
As I say on th eabut me page there is no best?
mAYBE ONLY lesse and some more good?
Indeed it is wise to close this "discussion".
Have fun all.....
I did have some contacts with ex- and members and they support most of my sites content.
As I say on th eabut me page there is no best?
mAYBE ONLY lesse and some more good?

Indeed it is wise to close this "discussion".
Have fun all.....
Cheers, Huub
[url=http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas]Visit my SAS site[/url]
[img]http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas/me150.jpg[/img]
[url=http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas]Visit my SAS site[/url]
[img]http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas/me150.jpg[/img]
i think if your going for SBS you have to pass the UKSF selection course (the same as the SAS) then once u have done that, you move onto your SBS training, from what ive read over the years i would say the SBS are more highly trained because they have to pass and complete everything an SAS man would, THEN do the SBS training. i could be wrong
i read somewhere that the SBS do more "black op" work, such as breaking into nuke plants in the UK and in allied countries to test security, not leaving a trace of course, the people never knew they were there. but i could be wrong again.

i read somewhere that the SBS do more "black op" work, such as breaking into nuke plants in the UK and in allied countries to test security, not leaving a trace of course, the people never knew they were there. but i could be wrong again.
-
- Guest
- sneaky beaky
- Member
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Mon 09 Sep, 2002 8:09 pm
- Location: 19th hole