TouchéParatrooper01 wrote:Last at what mate?Alfa wrote: it's not as easy to get rid of the 1st Battalion of a Regiment as it is the last Battalion.
"Last Battalion, The Parachute Regiment" doesnt quite have the same ring to it...

![]() |
Home | About Us | Articles | Forums | Shop | Reviews | Search | Contact Us | Advertise With Us |
Fair one. From what I've seen it tends to be the 'old and bold' that get more concerned than soldiers actually wearing the uniform. When the Pegasus was disbanded at the end of '99 all the old boys thought it was a travesty. And it was a shame, because there is a lot of history behind that badge. However, we were changing to a new brigade (ie moving from 5 Airborne to 16 Air Assault), so it made sense. And to be honest, Para Regt are on exercise or operations more often then in camp anyway, so who gives a damn about badges.Rogue Chef wrote:Leaving the specific reasons for any changes aside, I think we sometimes get a bit precious over this stuff.
I'm a big fan of history, culture and tradition, but the fact is that over the years all HM Forces have changed badges, changed uniforms, been amalgamated, changed names etc. It is a feature of an evolving and dynamic system.
Because it was no longer an Airborne Brigade. It wasn't even the same Brigade. So why should we have worn the badge of a Brigade we were no longer in? So cheers for the history lesson, I know my Regimental history.Tab wrote:GR Wrote who gives a dam a badges, those that have sweated blood to achieve one of them, and those who have fought and died wearing them. The Pegasus badge covered all troops in that were in the airborne from gliders to to the Para's, so why change it for th 16th Assault.
![]() |
© Copyright Military Forums 2001-2025. All rights reserved. All trademarks recognised. Contact us for more information on Military Forums. Would you like to Advertise with us? This website uses cookies. Please read our Terms & Conditions & Privacy Policy. Part of the WickidNet network. |
Sponsors:
|