Share This Page:

  

Para's dumbing down?

Discussions about those units who make up The Parachute Regiment.

Does beasting have its place in the modern military?

Yes
25
89%
No
3
11%
Undecided/other
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 28

Jack
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue 10 Jan, 2006 4:14 am
Location: UK

Para's dumbing down?

Post by Jack »

Over recent months (years really) we've seen all sorts of reports and media of the military "bullying" their new recruits. Like the most recent one where the marines where playing ringa-ringa-roses naked ... but lets not go into that :roll:.
Its been known in the Paras, that new recruits get a beasting that is disproportionate to their 'offence'. Do some of the Para vets. on this site think its was/is a good thing and the world is just too 'PC' for its own good. Or do you think it was needless, an it was used for them to vent?

The basic question is, does beasting have its place in the modern military?

Cheers, :drinking:
Jack.
Last edited by Jack on Wed 11 Jan, 2006 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Doc
Guest
Guest

Post by Doc »

Beastings should stay and if anything go back to how it was before the Forces got all PC, after all you cant sue a terrorist for shooting a gun too loud.

On a different matter, alter your signature.........

(MARINE MARINE, IN A BOAT, LIVING PROOF, SHIT DOES FLOAT!),

not because Im Pro Marine and anti Para (which Im not), but we are a community and whilst piss takes occur between colour of lid and badges worn, we dont welcome blatant crap like that, especially from a civvy/recruit.
SO19
Member
Member
Posts: 3105
Joined: Sun 02 Oct, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Cumbria
Contact:

Post by SO19 »

not because Im Pro Marine and anti Para (which Im not), but we are a community and whilst piss takes occur between colour of lid and badges worn, we dont welcome blatant crap like that, especially from a civvy/recruit.
Hear, hear.
[i]‘We are not interested in the possibilities of defeat’ - Queen Victoria, 1899[/i]
Jack
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue 10 Jan, 2006 4:14 am
Location: UK

Post by Jack »

Doc wrote:after all you cant sue a terrorist for shooting a gun too loud.
I don't think the volume is the problem.

Beasting has its place, but when its misguided and has no use then i think it shouldn't happen. Some beasting might be used to create teamwork within a group, which is all well and good. But when its directed at one person unrelentingly then i think its lost its point.

:)
Doc
Guest
Guest

Post by Doc »

..and I think you missed th point.

One of the reasons people get beasted is to learn their own breaking point, you'll be amazed at how much you can put up with, and it does help to know that when at the pointy end, and also to instill that stress level that you will find when people your not on first name terms with try and blow your head off with an RPG.

Nothing mirrors it exactly, but beastings prepare you. Beasting isnt bullying, but I agree that occasionally it does move from a good old fashion beasting into something that shouldnt happen.

In my experience the best beastings are from the people you respect the most. Those who cant hack a beasting are generally weak and have no respect, not the type of chap you want next to you when the faeces hits the fan.

It also instills teamwork by a beasting for someone elses mistake, it makes them feel guilty and the rest of you tend to take the plank to oneside and explain the benefits of un-PC explanations that turn plank into decent bloke.

When beastings fail but continue toward a bloke not suited to the stress and isnt getting the message or you have a bully abusing his postition, then is the time to remember that these circumstances are rare and not tollerated.

My point about the gunfire if you still dont get it is this, with the forces getting so PC and touchy feely, how can you expect future "warriors" to react properly when getting shot at. The enemy dont play by the same rules we do, and you cant lodge a formal complaint when Mustafa Mohamhead decides he prefers your oppos head 12 foot from his torso.

Beastings work, bullies arent tolerated and I whilst your free to voice your opinion and welcome to ask the question, unless youve been there and done it I hold no value in your explanations of what should and shouldnt happen.

Im happy to have been beasted, and was happier to serve with blokes who have been beasted as oppossed to the pink lace hold hands and touchy feely brigade that believe soft measures create hard soldiers.
Jack
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue 10 Jan, 2006 4:14 am
Location: UK

Post by Jack »

I'm not oppossed to beastings, not at all, I think its a great way to get people to pull their weight and to follow orders without hesitation.

But a few people who used to be in the Para's and other parts of the armed services have told me of the beastings that seem to go under the radar, instances such as class room teachings, if someone genuinely doesn't understand a topic then they are beasted (both verbaly and physicly) until they 'understand'. Its this kind of beasting I have a problem with, when someone genuinely needs help. It was also mentioned that they still continue with the training, even though they still don't understand.
The only metaphor I can think of is writing lines for a punishment in school, it may teach you not do it again, but if your given the punishment because you got something wrong or don't understand it totally misses the point.
I know I have no experience of this, i'm just expressing the concerns of people who have been through it. And i don't pretend to know the in's and out of military life. But surely some humility is needed from time to time.

Your right, no one wants to serve next to a fag'. But i'd also not want to serve under someone who thinks the only way of getting people to do things is to shout.

I do expect a heck of a beasting, its part and parcel of the Army, especially with a spearhead force such as the Paras. But as I say, where its due.

*edit*
Jack wrote:Personally, I think its pointless (to an extent). Although when I get in, I do expect to get a beasting (doesn't mean I have to like it). But as I haven't gone through it and seen the results it can have, my opinion doesn't really matter.
That statement in the initial post gives the wrong impression, so best to ignore that, better still i'll delete it
User avatar
got1
Member
Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed 16 Apr, 2003 8:30 pm
Location: scotland

Post by got1 »

Jack, you have a lot to learn if your profile is true.
Jack
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue 10 Jan, 2006 4:14 am
Location: UK

Post by Jack »

got1 wrote:Jack, you have a lot to learn if your profile is true.
How do you mean?

The points I've mentioned are points that other Para's have expressed to me, they arn't stupid, and they certainly are not fag's, wusses or anyother analogy of a wimp. It's true, I personally have alot to learn, I don't claim that I don't. Just creating a discussion.
User avatar
Tab
Member
Member
Posts: 7275
Joined: Wed 16 Apr, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Southern England
Contact:

Post by Tab »

During your time in the Regiment you could well be asked to do things that seem down right suicidal, and it is that training that carries you through. Now much of training is due to the way your basic training has been done. Now beasting is one of the things in the training to get you to accept your orders and get on with your task. The problem is when the odd instructor seems to be turned on by all this and takes far to far.
hc00
Member
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed 19 Oct, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Runcorn

Post by hc00 »

I wonder who voted no..?

My opinions pretty much worthless because I havent experienced it firsthand but I agree with beasting for all the reasons stated by doc and others.

Will beasting also go someway to stopping people disobaying orders?

I would have thpught so but doc didn't mention it. Although easily missed I suppose.
Wo zhu ni jian kang.
Doc
Guest
Guest

Post by Doc »

From my experience you get a mixture of people joining up. Some come from families where there has been strong discipline and values, or previous working enviroments such as police etc. These people tend to follow orders. Some who come from different backgrounds tend to gob off alot more and question things.

Its hard to generalise a persons character based on this alone though. It comes down the the person.

If you argue or question the basic orders then the whole troop will get a beasting until matey clicks into the understanding that not everything can be questioned. At the end of the day the ones with the rank that will be directing the order of battle wont have time to give full explanations over a hot wet when you have rounds incoming.

Orders are there to ensure the unit remains effective and tasks are carried out in a disciplined professional and effective manner. Someone gobbing off at the wrong time could mean you all get shot.

As training progresses you start to understand the whys and why nots and as your experience develops you feel at home with the way things are done. Its all for a reason, the key is to appreciate that in training that reason may not always be obvious. You have to trust the NCOs and officers above you.

Saying that there are like in any walks of life bad eggs who abuse their power, but as with everything else these twonks become apparant and there are measures in place to help. The problem with training when everythings new is understanding a beasting with purpose and bullying and if it is bullying having the confidence to speak up.

When you begin to fully understand the system and how things work you will realise bullying is rare and not tollerated, but a bollocking may well be a beasting when warranted. No decent NCO just beasts people for no reason, there is usually a learning curve but it wont always be apparant straight away.

I once got in the shit and my SSM said theres the paperwork way that will cost you money or you could come round the back of the building, except a thump and we'll all put it down to experience. I took the thump, from a bloke I respected and for something I knew I did wrong. So sometimes its better off to except the way things are done.

Ive also been in a troop where we took a right gobby twat outside and kicked into him, he sorted himself out and became a star. Sometimes w4nkers are unaware they are being w4nkers, until Mr fist explains the situation.

Ive always appreciated honesty and upfront black and white decisions, its alot better than the long winded route where you end up hating the very bloke that was trying to help you get a grip with things.

If anyone thinking of joining up questions how he may react to a thump from his oppos or a beasting from his NCO's then the forces aint for you as you will also question things at the wrong time and die, or even worse get others killed.

Theres a huge difference between a beating and bullying, if your being bullied smack the twat back..........endex.

Remember sometimes what you read in the papers is fueled by more than a particular incident in most cases. and we know neither the bloke whos claiming or the people hes moaning about.

The forces is hard work, hard play and a great life. You could have a beasting before breakfast, cracking up at a joke at lunch and drinking a pint or 4 that evening..........all with the same bloke.

I do however believe that the installation of good discipline, trust and uniformity makes for a more effective unit and soldier, beasting is a means to an end to achive that.

Also remember the guy beasting you has also been beasted more times than he cares to remember.

Also remember beasting is a term people use sometimes without a clear understanding of what it means. Hence some of the confusion.

A gym beasting is a farking horrible experience until it ends then you feel great. A beasting out in the field with full kit, stays a tad longer as your still working hard until you get back to camp. A beasting in the guardroom because your kit was shit during morning parade makes you turn out spot on from that day on. Makes you a better person and nine times out of ten the people who havent had many beastings turn into knobs in a unit, and the ones who have been through the mill become a better man for doing so.

Once your in a unit, you still get beasted but you know why and you call it warming up or constructive bollocking as oppossed to beasting.

Honestly dont worry about it, you'll hate guard duty and drill practice alot more :lol:
jcclimber
Member
Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon 10 Oct, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: Not a very nice place tourist wise

beastings

Post by jcclimber »

It is part of the process of divorcing a recruit from his civilian life. If you had a soldier thinking he was still in 'civvy' street, it would probably be certain that he would get himself and his squad killed in a hostile situation. In western societies where democracy and civil rights are the norm, beastings are a good way to let recruits know that the rules are different.
User avatar
got1
Member
Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed 16 Apr, 2003 8:30 pm
Location: scotland

Post by got1 »

Jack wrote:
got1 wrote:Jack, you have a lot to learn if your profile is true.
How do you mean?

I don't claim that I don't. Just creating a discussion.
Why don't you create a dicussion on something you know about.

Read Doc's last post, and as they say. inwardly digest.
User avatar
Tab
Member
Member
Posts: 7275
Joined: Wed 16 Apr, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Southern England
Contact:

Post by Tab »

Jack....If you are that worried don't join, go and become a scout leader or some thing
User avatar
Greenronnie
Member
Member
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat 03 Dec, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Oxfordshire/USA

Post by Greenronnie »

Beastings are absolutely neccessary to create the required soldier, ie a f****g hard one. The full screws in Depot have thier hands tied a lot ref this sort of thing nowadays, and if the PC brigade had thier way we would be turning out friendly, PC happy fellows rather than Maroon Machines. In the present World situation we need robust, go-to-it soldiers that aren't worried about a bit of hardship in order to get the job done. Beastings are part of the building process of said soldiers.
Post Reply