Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sat 24 Jan, 2004 8:44 pm
by bootneck
How many builders with trowels were there? shyte, it must have been a big mix, we now know why when training as a barrister she chose human rights, with a face like that..............and with her dad being an actor, he must have trained tony pretty damn good, because thats all this sham is, an act.
Posted: Sun 25 Jan, 2004 5:20 pm
by Tab
Posted: Sun 25 Jan, 2004 7:19 pm
by Guest
Has there been a full inquest on Dr David Kelly as I see that the press are still referring to the 'alleged' suicide, or is it that Lord Hutton is announcing the verdict at 1230 hrs Wednesday.
I watched the Jonathan Dimbleby show at lunchtime today and by popular demand on a 'yougov' poll the head of Hoon the Buffoon looks as if it will be staked on Wednesday on Westminster Bridge.
Posted: Mon 26 Jan, 2004 2:50 pm
by Mr Grimsdale
if only that really were to happen!
the joy
hoon, blair and 2 jags swinging from the lamp posts
mr brown would probably tax us for watching though
Posted: Mon 26 Jan, 2004 11:32 pm
by bootneck
Mr Grimsdale wrote:
mr brown would probably tax us for watching though
Many a true word spoken in jest

Posted: Wed 28 Jan, 2004 3:50 pm
by Guest
Spannerman wrote:Just a few days to go to see who walks the plank!
I wonder what the Kelly family are thinking or whether they will be told anything in advance of the reports findings. I wouldn't mind betting that B Liar will be walking on water though.
Now why did I think that, I have to accept the Hutton findings BUT were millions of us really duped into what Gillighan said on the BBC?
Posted: Wed 28 Jan, 2004 4:17 pm
by bootneck
I see the Tories want an, "Independant Enquiry." the result smells a bit don`t you think?
Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 2:40 pm
by bootneck
owdun wrote:Did we really expect a different outcome ??? When you appoint the referee , you win, end of story.
Aye Owdun.

I didn`t think we did expect anything else, two heads have rolled at the beeeeeb, pity non in the cabinet.
Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 3:31 pm
by Guest
If the BBC broadcast a programme where Gilligan enlarged upon the truth ie Telling Lies and two of the top bosses resign, why is it when we are told that Weapons of Mass Destruction are a basis of going to war and none have been found is not that a lie, if it is why has our most illustrious leader too not resigned?
Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 4:47 pm
by Mr Grimsdale
Blair and the boys are doing well now, the BBC Director General has just resigned too! No one in the government has been affected only the top brass at the Beeb take the flak.
The government will probably privatise the BBC to plug the gap in their finances.

Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 6:35 pm
by Humphs
I can't wait for this years " Honours " list to appear.
Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 6:52 pm
by Guest
Cant believe Phony Tony gets away with it yet again, no doubt his pal Rupert Murdoch got a preview for the Sun as well. The whole thing stinks to high heaven. It'll be interesting when the polls next come out, ill wager that the British public will still not rate Blair very highly.
Posted: Thu 29 Jan, 2004 7:41 pm
by Guest
Looking at the news networks tonight and the polls, it is not looking very good for BLIAR but of course he has been shown as squeaky clean
Posted: Fri 30 Jan, 2004 3:14 am
by Kalachnik
Hi guys, just curious why you lot will not be happy untill Blair is booted out. I am not an expert when it comes to politics, but it does seem strange. For instance, if he is found to be in the clear, it stinks. If he is guilty, well we all knew that, he is this that and the other. I mean fair enough if you don't like him, but it does seem very biased at times. Could you please put your reasons for thinking like this, i am not saying you are wrong, just curious.
Cheers
