...hmmm so by "due" process you mean Iraqi process which can't be described as "due" in any civilised sense at allBy “due process” I meant Iraqi process, not Old Bailey standards, m`learned friend.
I remember your opposition well and that of many others on this site, that's not in issue. Neither is your support of our troops in question and I hope you're not suggestion that mine is?
Here's an example of some of the opposition from before the invasion:
viewtopic.php?p=18083&highlight=haq#18083
Sadly, there's not so much of that type of discussion now with Rob, Andy and Dave not getting involved anymore and Sisyphus posting only now and again. Incidentally, have a look at the obituray of Abdul Haq linked in my post. Heckmatyar is one of the main players now opposing 'allied' troops in Helmand. Can't we learn anything?
What draws me to this discussion is the fact that everybody seems to think this was a Bad Thing - even the Iraqi prosecution representative (who threatened to leave) and the Iraqi government ffs
I remember the reaction on here to the nutting of that Brazillian fella, remember that? That went well didn't it
I honestly couldn't care less whether Saddam lived or died, it doesn't affect my life directly - I don't travel around London that often now. But I know families whose loved ones are a bit closer to the firing line than me and peurile baying for blood and calls for the matching of attrocities over here does them no favours given the lack of logistical and political support given to them.
Finally,
may or may not have been cruel heartless bastards but one thing seems for sure and that is that they were supporters of Moqtada Al Sadr. You do know who he is don't you? And how much British blood does he have on his hands?Those cruel, heartless bastards.
Other than that mucker I fully agree with you
Can we have some more tree hugging/lefty/pc posts



