Share This Page:

  

Women in the SAS?

General discussions on joining & training in the British Army.
Oakers
Member
Member
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 05 Jun, 2003 4:42 pm
Location: Midlands

Re

Post by Oakers »

Agreed
Midshipman786
Guest
Guest

Post by Midshipman786 »

im against women in SF for the same reason as im against women in the infantry. even if they do pass Selection all they'll do is be in a supporting role so why even bother in the first place..
User avatar
gash-hand
Member
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: Tue 26 Nov, 2002 2:22 pm
Location: Hants

Post by gash-hand »

Jesus christ. I thought we had this one sorted out.

Women are serving in an active SF role today in the British forces.

There's more to SF than sas/sbs.

Thats it I now give up.
Nuisance
lew
Member
Member
Posts: 2731
Joined: Fri 09 May, 2003 9:51 am
Location: CTC 905 troop

Post by lew »

And the battle of the sexes rage on, this is a debate that will never be ended there are guys out there that think no way in hell, and there are girls out there that think they have to do it to prove a point.

At the end of the day there will never be an agreement between the two. This is just like the whose the best convocation that keeps coming up, so please part as friends and go your separate ways
All I want in life is a cold beer, a fast car, a big F**King gun and a hot woman to fetch the beer, and clean the car! is that really to much to ask? - Quotes by a redneck.com

recruit test 21 march - PASSED
medical 30 march - PASSED
interview 30 march - PASSED
PJFT - 11 april - PASSED 9:18
PRMC - 7th - 10th JUNE. PASSED
foundation - 29th August
Twenty One
Member
Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri 02 May, 2003 10:57 am
Location: Paisley,Renfrewshire

Post by Twenty One »

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO, ABSOLUTELY NO WOMEN IN THE SPECIAL FORCES.I ALSO DO OBJECT TO THEM BEING ANY WAY ATTACHED TO THE INFANTRY,let them stay in offices and keep them busy doing paper work. The last thing you want is some screaming female on operations with you.Sorry ladies you are just not cut out for real soldiering stay at home and breast feed the bairn. :fist: :fist: :fist: :fist: :fist: :fist:
Dissent Protects Democracy,Gezza Brek!
User avatar
gash-hand
Member
Member
Posts: 983
Joined: Tue 26 Nov, 2002 2:22 pm
Location: Hants

Post by gash-hand »

:banghead:
Nuisance
bird
Member
Member
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu 15 May, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: England, Bristol

Post by bird »

No chance, not being sexist but throughout history who has gone away and hunted and fought the wars? Well I can tell you for one thing it was not the women, plus I agree women emotionally are weaker than men and the MAJORITY of men are stronger. Also to be honest the women, is surposed to take care of the children ect. I mean in a divorce case why do they always take the side of the mother? Anyway I think that women pay an important role in the military, some things you have to leave to a man!

Bird
On the road to recovery.
John/Sandy Ruane
Member
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue 29 Jan, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Exeter

women in the SAS

Post by John/Sandy Ruane »

Quite honestly, I do not believe I have just read some of the comments here, this is the 21st century, for Gods sake !!!!!
I think some of you should hang your heads in shame.
Some of you with no military experience, clearly don't know what you are talking about. As for the old and bold, well did any of you actually meet any of the girls from 14 Int ? No, probably not, infact, you probably never knew they existed. They (females) have worked in conditions, situations and areas of op, the like of which you would never in you're wildest dreams ever encounter. You do yourselves and them a disservice by the stupid remarks some of you have come out with.

Gash, lets leave this lot to it, they deserve one another.
Sandy
Bigwig
Member
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed 04 Jun, 2003 2:10 am
Location: Great Britain

Post by Bigwig »

Put a tampon in it will you.... so what if it is the 21st century, have women suddenly grown man features or something? :-?

I agree there is a place for women in cetrain roles within the armed forces but to put women in the SAS, paras, royal marines and various other roles is just down right stupid. :evil:
Maybe the old man of the treck can be my commissionaire
bird
Member
Member
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu 15 May, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: England, Bristol

Post by bird »

I agree as I said, if you had read it properly John,
I think that women pay an important role in the military,some things you have to leave to a man! .
Which is very true and I also believe that women should not be in the marine,para,and SF.
Bird
On the road to recovery.
User avatar
Josh
Member
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun 08 Jun, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: Sussex

Post by Josh »

Hello all,

Interesting topic, I almost want to bring up the social construction of masculinity, but I'm not going to! First things first I am not a sexist, homophobe or anything else in any way. We are all equal bullets kill men just as easily as they do women. I do however think you have to consider the fundamental element of practicality; the Army/Armed Forces will technically work better as a single sex unit of one sexuality (at a combat level at least). I will hold my hands up and say I am not, nor have I ever been in any armed force (soon will be hopefully) but you do not need to be to understand that the military is not like any other more "normal" job. This added to the fact that men are generally the stronger sex, history proves that if nothing else, means that logically the Army/Armed Forces should be a patriarchy.

This is not to say that there aren't military jobs that women excel at, particularly in some aspects of SF as sandy pointed out. But one thing I do believe is these jobs do not include the SAS (Women in the SAS was the original post title if any one can remember that far back) or even the Infantry (are the SAS technically an Infantry unit?!) due to physical and mental make up of the two sexes. Neither sex is better, just different making us suitable to different jobs!

N E way that is my two cents as it were, I did not mean to offend any one and I am very sorry if I did.
Midshipman786
Guest
Guest

Post by Midshipman786 »

iv no problem with female operatives in 14 Int, but thats an intelligence unit though isnt it? a totally different kettle of fish from military ops behind enemy lines etc thats a complete no-no.
John/Sandy Ruane
Member
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue 29 Jan, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Exeter

women in the sas

Post by John/Sandy Ruane »

Bigwig, I find your opening comments highly offensive and totally uncalled for. If you had bothered to read through this thread properly, you would have found that I at no time ever considered women in the SAS/SBS or indeed in any infantry type roles a good idea. Yes, there are some things best suited to one gender or the other. But as Gash and I and others, have been trying and obviously failing to point out, when people gob off about SF it is not just about the all guns and glory stuff that Mr McNab and co write about, either.
Sandy
Bigwig
Member
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed 04 Jun, 2003 2:10 am
Location: Great Britain

Post by Bigwig »

Sorry :(
Maybe the old man of the treck can be my commissionaire
Oakers
Member
Member
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 05 Jun, 2003 4:42 pm
Location: Midlands

Re!

Post by Oakers »

Bloody hell is this still going on?

There's really no point cracking on with this one lads because you have different opinions, and rightly so, so the same things are just being repeated and quite frankly, it got boring quite a while ago.

As Gash mentioned earlier :banghead:
Locked