Aye Owdun.
Share This Page:
Thick Soldiers
How anyone can defend the present education system is beyond me.! I listen to 15 and 16 year olds finkin and fortin, I see cashiers in super- markets who can't add 2+2 if the bloody till breaks down, and as for history and geography, it's a closed book to them. The Grammar schools are the only seats of excellence in this country, and the socialists would love to see them gone, as ignorance is bliss, and bliss suits the socialist agenda. The Matriculation exams taken by 16 year olds in the 1930s,40s and 50s, at Grammar schools, would make the present A levels look like child's play, and despite the propaganda put out by the educationalists, the people who left school at 14 years old, were not illiterate, but probably had a more rounded education than todays children. I left school at 14, in 1944, after four years of constant interruption , and I could read,write , had good basics in maths history and geography, and so did thousands like me. Todays system costs untold billions, and delivers a shoddy product.
Aye Owdun.
Aye Owdun.
Thats bollocks. There are people at my grammar school who havent got a clue. Its all about whether you are coached for the 11+ and if you have contacts.. 6 hours coaching and chances are high that you will get in.owdun wrote:The Grammar schools are the only seats of excellence in this country
Aye Owdun.
Other grammar schools around me are identical too.
The rest of your post is spot on though.
MM
[quote="wannabe_bootneck"]May be true, but the old ed. system screwed a lot of people over majorly, I nkow this as fact as I have studied this topic fairly recently, inf act, there's so much more to education than face value![/quote]
[b][size=24][/size]
You may be right because when I was on active duty, I tried to schedule college classes. It all depended on if the supervisor of your section approved of it. I was only able to take two classes while I was on active and I was very upset. I kept trying to get my supervisors to allow me to go to college while I was active but I was not able to do so.[/b]
[b][size=24][/size]
You may be right because when I was on active duty, I tried to schedule college classes. It all depended on if the supervisor of your section approved of it. I was only able to take two classes while I was on active and I was very upset. I kept trying to get my supervisors to allow me to go to college while I was active but I was not able to do so.[/b]
I can actually understand why they are doing this and that is because so many soldiers coming into the Army have degrees already. While I was on active duty I was serving with enlisted soldiers with Associate (AS) and Bachelor of Science (BS) degrees. This meant a lot of the enlisted solidiers in charge had to deal with soldiers who was problably qualified to do their job and do it better.rambo wrote:I think if they do this then the army will be cut in half to what its numbers are today. Im not saying there all dumb, im not going to point any out but you know who you are.
-
Pvt. Flanagan
- Member

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue 26 Apr, 2005 10:16 pm
- Location: Ireland
my thoughts on this are that the equipment should be designed to be useable by soldiers not our soldiers changed to use the equipment. And whatever about your academic achievements or lack of I realy dont believe it matters for an infantryman, I believe once you can communicate verbally and can atleast scribble down notes or whatever and can work out simple maths like how many rounds did I fire if I have x amount left etc the rest. Although already mentioned I shall repeat, a degree is one thing a degree in 'Cop on' is another matter all together.the rest in my humble opinion is irrelevent.
