Share This Page:

  

Legal age for consensual sex being lowered to 12

General Military Chat. New to the forums? Introduce yourself, Who are you and where are you from?
Wholley
Guest
Guest

Post by Wholley »

My wife told me that the age of conesnt in the US was raised to 51
just before we got married.
Oh well.....Just a year to go.
Hope they don't raise it again though!
Wholley.
:P
Artist
Guest
Guest

Post by Artist »

Peds

What are a Pimp or a farking Pirate?

Artist
Doc
Guest
Guest

Post by Doc »

Peds wrote: what if going to the toilet, or w@#k was made illegal (as it is in some countries)?
Is it? where? why would it be illegal to goto the toilet? and how would you police such a law?
So your sat there toilet roll ready, eyes closed, ready for action and suddenly the toilet door is kicked in, you ré read your rights and off to stand trial!
And what would such a police unit be called "noSQUATing"

mind boggles and so does my trollys now :P
User avatar
Scottish Thistle
Member
Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue 30 Mar, 2004 3:17 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by Scottish Thistle »

Is it? where? why would it be illegal to goto the toilet? and how would you police such a law?
So your sat there toilet roll ready, eyes closed, ready for action and suddenly the toilet door is kicked in, you ré read your rights and off to stand trial!
And what would such a police unit be called "noSQUATing"
Oooh Doc, totally pissing myself laughing here (which probably is illegal in 26 countries). :lol:
Live well - laugh often - love much
Doc
Guest
Guest

Post by Doc »

it is in germany you have to go in a bottle so it can be recycled as with everything else :lol:
User avatar
AequitasBellum
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun 04 Apr, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: CTCRM

Post by AequitasBellum »

It looks like the law is bringing a few rules with it. If the people having sex are under 16, then there is only allowed to be a 2 year age gap, so the pedophiles won't be able to practice their disgusting habits.
I still think that lowering the age will make young children think that sex at that age is normal, which it most certainly is not.
Gary_amsterdam
Member
Member
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue 22 Jul, 2003 7:31 pm

Post by Gary_amsterdam »

AequitasBellum wrote:It looks like the law is bringing a few rules with it. If the people having sex are under 16, then there is only allowed to be a 2 year age gap, so the pedophiles won't be able to practice their disgusting habits.
I still think that lowering the age will make young children think that sex at that age is normal, which it most certainly is not.
exactly, the law is like that here too, it won't make children think its normal, it will just stop them getting prosecuted if they are mature enough to have it. Sex is something very normal, it shouldn't be a taboo like it is in most countries.
Frank S.
Guest
Guest

Post by Frank S. »

At a time when the "human trade" is both safer and more profitable for criminal organizations than narcotics, the type of legislation mentioned in the first post is misguided at best, but more likely criminally negligent.

viewtopic.php?t=7938

Think how much you really, truly know of the reality of this 'human trade', defined in detached legalese by the UN and world governments, then please let's discuss the meaning of atrocity.

Think priorities. You'll maybe see how untimely and unwise lowering the age of consent is.
Chaff
Member
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu 25 Sep, 2003 9:50 pm
Location: UK

Post by Chaff »

Is this new consent law in New Zealand a sensationalist headline or is it actually going to be passed?

It's interesting what AB says about there being no more than a two year gap between partners under 16, because to all intents and purposes, although the legal age of consent for sex between a man and a woman in England, Scotland and Wales is 16 years, if both parties are younger and consenting the law turns a blind eye.

As wannabee pointed out there's something far more sleazy and objectionable about a 40 year old having sex with a young teen than there is with two fifteen year olds getting it on. Personally I feel the age of consent is about right at 16 as it affords some protection from the older more experienced man who may prey on vulnerable youngsters.

I think someone mentioned the 14 year old who was recently named (by her loving mother) in the press because the mother hadn't been informed that she'd been prescribed the morning after pill. I don't remember there being any outcry about the boyfriend of the girl in question performing an illegal act even though by law he had committed an offence.

I personally feel to lower the age of consent to 12 is asking for problems. Not for those 12 year olds who are physically and emotionally mature enough to make an informed judgement, and let's face it, there are quite a few, but for those who aren't and who find themselves in a situation they can't control. The law is there to protect the latter and I think it would be foolish to change it.
Gary_amsterdam
Member
Member
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue 22 Jul, 2003 7:31 pm

Post by Gary_amsterdam »

Chaff wrote:Is this new consent law in New Zealand a sensationalist headline or is it actually going to be passed?

It's interesting what AB says about there being no more than a two year gap between partners under 16, because to all intents and purposes, although the legal age of consent for sex between a man and a woman in England, Scotland and Wales is 16 years, if both parties are younger and consenting the law turns a blind eye.

As wannabee pointed out there's something far more sleazy and objectionable about a 40 year old having sex with a young teen than there is with two fifteen year olds getting it on. Personally I feel the age of consent is about right at 16 as it affords some protection from the older more experienced man who may prey on vulnerable youngsters.

I think someone mentioned the 14 year old who was recently named (by her loving mother) in the press because the mother hadn't been informed that she'd been prescribed the morning after pill. I don't remember there being any outcry about the boyfriend of the girl in question performing an illegal act even though by law he had committed an offence.

I personally feel to lower the age of consent to 12 is asking for problems. Not for those 12 year olds who are physically and emotionally mature enough to make an informed judgement, and let's face it, there are quite a few, but for those who aren't and who find themselves in a situation they can't control. The law is there to protect the latter and I think it would be foolish to change it.
then you will get laws like in holland, were actually your not alowed to smoke weed but the police turn a blind eye on 300 shops selling it and people smoking it everywhere '

:drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking:

Well, Im off to get laid this weekend :D
Undertow
Member
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 3:35 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post by Undertow »

Hey up,

the law isn't going to be passed yet. It still has to go through all the different stages that a law or whatever needs to go through to made legal. I think it has it's ups and downs. With this law come's harsher penalties for kiddie fiddlers and longer supervision after they get released (KILL THEM) but I have never met anyone round 12-14 who is mentally ready for sex. But it is just one of these stupid things New Zealand just HAS to do... damn I hate this place :fist:
Wholley
Guest
Guest

Post by Wholley »

Has NZ really gotten that bad?
I was in Huntly some years ago and I had a great time.
Having said that I did hear a rather odd joke,which took me some time to understand."Ey mate,did you know Fred died?No mate,I didn't even know e'd been arristed.Smacked of South Effrika to me.
I figured Konstabel Els must have moved.
Wholley.
:o
User avatar
minimac
Member
Member
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: wirral

Post by minimac »

Nobody pays any attention to the Law anyway.

I had sex at 15 with a 15 year old girl. I know someone who has had 3 abortions. Shes 14!
Changing the Law won't make any difference at all.

But 12 is too young. Its just wrong.

MM
Kanadiana
Member
Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Wed 24 Dec, 2003 11:59 am
Location: Canada

Post by Kanadiana »

Peds wrote:i just dont see why having sex before a certain age should be illegal - make the age 0, for all I care.

why should a natural instinct, a bodily function, be against the law? what if going to the toilet, or w@#k was made illegal (as it is in some countries)?

lowering the age of consent will not spawn a thousand-strong army of kiddie-fiddlers and rapists. they are already there, doing their dirty work.

education is the key. educate the children!
PEDS ... how did you decide on the nickname "Peds" ... to get a "rise"... I'm truly curious because I haven't noticed your "nickname"in here before. Perhaps I just missed it? I wonder because of the topic of your post here. Lowered age of consent is the ultimate delight of many a pedophile, kiddie-diddler, kiddie fiddler ... there are many many effective and successful ways to "get a child to consent to sex" ...

Lowering the age, my friend, will indeed spawn a MULTIPLE-thousand-strong GROUP of pedophiles, male and female. (please do NOT SULLY the name ARMY by connecting that VALUE term with anything so disrespectful and dishonourable as pedophilia... those pedophiles who had indeed been held in check by laws because they had much to lose if caught, now have their fears removed... if all they need is consent, well hell hey ho and hotdam be danged... alls I gotta do is get the kid to say they CONSENTED. Its actually pretty easy to do darlins.... trust me on this one.

Any country that has lowest consent ages is a sure bet for a tourist boom ... the attraction? Legalized pedophilia. What a money maker for that country! It pays to turn a blind eye to whats reeally goin' on.

LOGIC ... think with your head, not your nether regions or your idealism and naivety here. Practical logic ... natural progression, all that.

I want to say that I've noticed this thread and been watching the pages multiply, looked in at the first 2 posts once and then backed out. My history makes me a tad sensitive to some topics... like this one for the images of 12 year olds becoming fair game and legal prey if you can get them to at least SAY they consented. . But I can still think when initial reactions die down, venif its still emotional.

There is a HUGE HUMONGOUS difference between "true consentual sex" and "manipulated through coercion sex" of younger people...boys and girls by those whose agenda is getting their jollies or fantasies realized.

Kids will agree to SAY THEY CONSENTED or even agree to sex willingly if the loss if they don't COMPLY is too large for them to bear. Fear based. Dependency. whatever... lotsa reasons.

None of them TRUE CONSENTUAL SEX.

Yes... I'm frazzled here ... I know how this shit works. This sort of law would open the door to incredible violations of children. Period.

ok. I'm done for now ... hitting post message now.
User avatar
minimac
Member
Member
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:20 pm
Location: wirral

Post by minimac »

Peds.

You are truly screwed up big time mate.

Get help. NOW

MM :evil: :evil: :evil:
Post Reply