Share this page:

Which party will be/has been best for the armed forces?

Interested or active in politics, discuss here.
Message
Author
Jon
Megastar Member
Megastar Member
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue 10 Jun, 2003 10:54 pm
Location: Liverpool

#16 Post by Jon »

goreD. wrote:I think that history will show that the NAZI party gave the shot in the arm that the German military so badly needed.

Gore.
But breaking the Treaty of Versailles in the process. The world should have acted sooner. One of the reasons for attacking Saddam was that, if the UN embargos and sanctions were lifted (which was being pressed for), he would have been able to rebuild his armed forces and weapons on a massive scale. At least we learnt from the 1930s that allowing certain dictators to flourish spelt disastor, even if it was only for that one occassion.
The Best Is Yet To Come

Advertise your company or services here and contact us today!

Spannerman
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1049
Joined: Mon 14 Apr, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: East Anglia

#17 Post by Spannerman »

..............supposition Jon.................

User avatar
stokerpoons
New Member
New Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu 29 Apr, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Contact:

#18 Post by stokerpoons »

Back onto the point i would say the tories have more often than not put there money where their mouth is and spend more on the forces.
Online Rugby League Community
[url=http://www.leagueworld.co.uk]www.LeagueWorld.co.uk[/url]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests