MilitaryForums.co.uk

Women have no business in combat because they can’t hang. You PC panty waste wimps have no clue about the Infantry.

First, Women aren’t physically equal to men. It’s that simple. Congress has had the military run many test and polls measuring the strengths of women against men in the mid-nineties and found that women SIGNIFICANTLY under performed when matched against men. . It you non-infantry types out there believe that women are just as capable of fighting a war as a man you must answer this question. Why don’t they mix The NBA with female members of the WNBA? Or in any other sport? Why do we segregate Olympic competition between men and women? You know the answer because the women can’t compete. If men started demanding to compete in sports in high school or pro sports the women’s lib would wet themselves. I wonder what their excuse would be for not letting the boys go up against the girls.

Secondly, there is the group moral problem. This brings up a variety of issues like; will a woman who is in patrol base with a bunch of men pull down her pants and go to the bathroom in front of a bunch of men? Grunts have to do this all time, we don’t latrines in the enemies back yard. And will you scream sexual harassment every time you go to the bathroom. There is no privacy 100 yards from the enemy.

Thirdly, just look at the PT requirements between men and women. If women had to meet the same requirements as the men, only about 5% of the women currently in the army would make it. For those that could make it, they just would have the killer instinct of a male. I don’t care if this is UN-PC because this is life and death. If you give women the equal opportunity to enter combat you will only give them an unequal opportunity to die in combat.


Thats my 2 pence.

Hey goron, firstly welcome to the forum.

Secondly this subject was done to death a good few months ago.

Enjoy the forums.


lew

look mate women have proven themselves and have completed things like the AACC as well as p company which the majority of men including you would fail

Lets not forget the contribution women had on the eastern front, fighting and dieing alongside men against the Nazis. Women can do just as good a job as men can and eventually we will realise this.

If anything it is men that are holding women back, our attitudes and cultural perception of women in the west.

Hey, Goron, the 1700's called, they said you're missing.

If they can hack the same training and harsh conditions as the blokes they're serving along side, then I see no reason for them not to be let in. So longs they have to do everything the guys do, and can do it, I really can't see a problem so longs as everyone's professional about it.

i reckon the army is fine as it is at the mo as in women serving in combat dont fix something that aint broken

Sticky Blue wrote:Goron49,
you are basing all this on what experience?

Your Profile wrote:Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Total posts: 1
[0.00% of total / 1.00 posts per day]
Find all posts by Goron49
Location: UK
Website:
Occupation: Hello
Interests: Hello

Basing this form what I know.

No disrespect mate but I agree with him. I mean are you a squaddie/marine or whatever (or ex).

What qualifies you to make such a sweeping comment?

No disrespect intended but if we knew where you were coming from it might influence how we reacted to your comments.

Welcome btw - I'm new too.

flynn101 wrote:look mate women have proven themselves and have completed things like the AACC as well as p company which the majority of men including you would fail

No women has yet passed P-Coy

Basing this form what I know

Usually, and I mean usually we allow new members a tad of leeway. However, as you cannot spell, appear to be another 14 year old super wazzock without the necessary knowledge or experience to justify opening his wide open gob, I'll forego the leeway.
Get some time in you oik, then come back and propound some original thoughts.

That last sentence should mean we will see the back of you.

Irony, always fails the first time.

Incidentally.............yes I know it's another big word.......
Your handle, check the spelling, just perhaps the first letter should have been M.

I think he copy and pasted that section of pointless script from a website, check the wording and then his follow-up comments.....

and also "congress"

The only battle he's probably fought is the one where he has to wet wipe his ring before his next "friend" squats in behind for a bayonet charge!

i stand corrected on the women para thing i didnt know she broke her leg poor girl

El Prez wrote:

Basing this form what I know

Usually, and I mean usually we allow new members a tad of leeway. However, as you cannot spell, appear to be another 14 year old super wazzock without the necessary knowledge or experience to justify opening his wide open gob, I'll forego the leeway.
Get some time in you oik, then come back and propound some original thoughts.

That last sentence should mean we will see the back of you.

Irony, always fails the first time.

Incidentally.............yes I know it's another big word.......
Your handle, check the spelling, just perhaps the first letter should have been M.

It's a typo, I'm not MRS Perfect like you. I only misspelled one word and you automatically say "HE'S A 14 YEAR OLD BECAUSE HE MISSPELLED 1 WORD"

You need to grow up instead of judging people from their posts.