Page 1 of 2
A Vote on Worst Places to live in the Uk showed ...
Posted: Fri 16 Nov, 2007 4:12 pm
by aspinall
The top 20 worst list:
1. Middlesbrough - North East
2. Hull - Humberside
3. Newham - East London
4. Nottingham - East Midlands
5. Merthyr Tydfil - South Wales
6. North East Lincolnshire - Eastern England
7. Islington - North London
8. Blaenau Gwent - South Wales
9. Mansfield - East Midland s 10. Knowsley - Merseyside
11. Blackpool - North West
12. Hackney - East London
13. Stoke-on-Trent - Staffordshire
14. Barking and Dagenham - East London
15. Doncaster - South Yorkshire
(Home,sweet,Home)
16. Cannock Chase - Staffordshire
17. Manchester - North West
18. Haringey - North London
19. Burnley - Lancashire
20. Hartlepool - North East
Doncaster is great !!! lol
..... but it says that " It’s not big and it sure ain’t clever"
Posted: Fri 16 Nov, 2007 4:28 pm
by jabcrosshook
I have to agree that Doncaster isn't anything special, especially with the centre part and old council estates.
But then Doncaster does have quite a few multi-millionaires out bessacarr way and further out going to the country side.
Posted: Fri 16 Nov, 2007 8:10 pm
by davidemmerson
I'm surprised Plymouth isn't on there- it's pretty grubby and was described by someone on TV as "The toliet of England"
How apt
Posted: Fri 16 Nov, 2007 8:27 pm
by Artist
Whers Crewe?
Artist
Posted: Fri 16 Nov, 2007 9:14 pm
by Tartan_Terrier
I know a few places in Scotland that are conspicuous by their absence from the list.
Re: A Vote on Worst Places to live in the Uk showed ...
Posted: Sat 17 Nov, 2007 12:32 am
by jayne
SKELMERSDALE LANCASHIRE and it was on the tv recently
Posted: Sat 17 Nov, 2007 1:45 pm
by harry hackedoff
Artboy, Crewe didn`t get a mention mate, but SoT did, at number thirteen.
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2009 3:48 pm
by skidloaf
Jeez! I've lived in four of those places!
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2009 4:26 pm
by Tab
Aspinall is those places that are bed or did you just leave them in a bad way, as you have seemed to have moved around quite a bit to produce such a list.
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2009 5:03 pm
by Al_2
Lutons got to be on there somewhere
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2009 5:39 pm
by aspinall
Tab wrote:Aspinall is those places that are bed or did you just leave them in a bad way, as you have seemed to have moved around quite a bit to produce such a list.
Nar i got the list off this website that i was looking on
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2009 11:07 pm
by Stokey_14
Only 13th! Bloody poor show if you ask me! Thought we would have done much better than that
Might not be beautiful to look at but I wouldn't change it for the world especially not the football club.
Stokey
Posted: Sat 07 Feb, 2009 1:17 pm
by MSI64
Whoever did that list has obviously never lived in Woolwich
Posted: Sat 07 Feb, 2009 1:49 pm
by gt1980
Stokey_14 wrote:Only 13th! Bloody poor show if you ask me! Thought we would have done much better than that
Might not be beautiful to look at but I wouldn't change it for the world especially not the football club.
Stokey
I'm from stoke and i would change it. I'd bring back the pottery ind. the steel and michelin. At least then the people of stoke could earn decent money, now thanks to the council we've lost nearly all the skilled industry and being filled with distribution centres, which only pay about £6-7 per hour. yes I believe stoke should be number 1 on that list and i believe at one point it was. Stoke is a dump in general but i believe it's down to the way it's run. I personally wouldn't change the area I live in as I don't know of any other area like it, but I completely disagree with the way stokes moving and it's backwards.
Posted: Sat 07 Feb, 2009 2:36 pm
by Brett B
haha ncie to see hampshire isnt on it