willie petes in iraq
Posted: Sat 19 Nov, 2005 8:12 pm
Is anyone else annoyed by the media's limpet-like tendancy to hold onto a topic and throw a dangerously mis-informed light on it? I have done a quick search through the forums but couldnt find a thread already on this matter, so I thought I would start one.
I have just taken a post I made in reply to the subject off of another forum I frequent, bad grammar, bad language and all. I'm sure the blocker will censor most of it.
_____
this absolutely frigging pisses me off, its an amazing example of why they shouldnt say ANYTHING on the open media without checking their godamned facts first.
white phosphorous is NOT a chemical weapon. it is a CONVENTIONAL weapon. and why is it "banned" for use? because it hurts people, oh, boo hoo. apparantly it stings a bit to be burnt alive by incendiary devices. which is the more humane way of killing someone, burning them to death with willie petes or beating them to death with a stick with a nail through the end of it? its a f@#k farse that reporters and pundits should ever even BEGIN to question the deployment of various weapons in a military campaign.
lets pretend for a minute that we are going to be nitpicking and pedantic. yes, phosphorous is a chemical, yes, it is a weapon. high explosives are a random mixture of chemicals. does that make them a chemical weapon too? the 2000lb bombs dropped from your F15s, are they chemical weapons? no, they are conventional weapons. chemical weapons are things like your mustard gas, your sarin gas, your various nerve agents. they might be bastards, but the US would never even dream of bringing these dispicable weapons into play on a modern battlefield. willie petes have more in common with your 13th century halbard than they do with chemical weapons. its the f@#k media, all of those misinformed and presumptuous reporters leaping around the place with their feet in their mouths that spew the kind of horse shit that the gawping public are dumb enough to believe.
it is EXACTLY the same as me walking onto the set of match of the day and spouting off a load of bullcrap about football. i dont follow the game, i havnt got a clue about the merits of different players. the same is true of all of these numpties with a pen and a contract with the daily f@#k mail. they think that because they can reach people through the media, they have the right to whinge about things they dont have a f@#k clue about.
willie petes (white phosphorous, WP) are an amazingly effective way of getting the job that they were designed to do DONE. why else would they have been designed.
shoot the f@#k reporters who havnt got a clue what they are talking about, not the guys who are using this stuff.
f@#k off, the lot of them.
I have just taken a post I made in reply to the subject off of another forum I frequent, bad grammar, bad language and all. I'm sure the blocker will censor most of it.
_____
this absolutely frigging pisses me off, its an amazing example of why they shouldnt say ANYTHING on the open media without checking their godamned facts first.
white phosphorous is NOT a chemical weapon. it is a CONVENTIONAL weapon. and why is it "banned" for use? because it hurts people, oh, boo hoo. apparantly it stings a bit to be burnt alive by incendiary devices. which is the more humane way of killing someone, burning them to death with willie petes or beating them to death with a stick with a nail through the end of it? its a f@#k farse that reporters and pundits should ever even BEGIN to question the deployment of various weapons in a military campaign.
lets pretend for a minute that we are going to be nitpicking and pedantic. yes, phosphorous is a chemical, yes, it is a weapon. high explosives are a random mixture of chemicals. does that make them a chemical weapon too? the 2000lb bombs dropped from your F15s, are they chemical weapons? no, they are conventional weapons. chemical weapons are things like your mustard gas, your sarin gas, your various nerve agents. they might be bastards, but the US would never even dream of bringing these dispicable weapons into play on a modern battlefield. willie petes have more in common with your 13th century halbard than they do with chemical weapons. its the f@#k media, all of those misinformed and presumptuous reporters leaping around the place with their feet in their mouths that spew the kind of horse shit that the gawping public are dumb enough to believe.
it is EXACTLY the same as me walking onto the set of match of the day and spouting off a load of bullcrap about football. i dont follow the game, i havnt got a clue about the merits of different players. the same is true of all of these numpties with a pen and a contract with the daily f@#k mail. they think that because they can reach people through the media, they have the right to whinge about things they dont have a f@#k clue about.
willie petes (white phosphorous, WP) are an amazingly effective way of getting the job that they were designed to do DONE. why else would they have been designed.
shoot the f@#k reporters who havnt got a clue what they are talking about, not the guys who are using this stuff.
f@#k off, the lot of them.