Asylum seekers

[JulesB]

Ive had to go and put my specs on! There! that'll destroy any spurious thoughts you might have had!!!!

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SA80! Crap weapon!

That should do it!!!!

[TheCount]

Spurious

been a long time since I heard that used

You wouldn't fit the bill anyway Need to be Russian, black hair and pale skin, not that I'm picky or nothing.

[JulesB]

Ooooh! I say....exotic tastes! Get a lot of those in Sussex do you????

One half of Tatu your thing then?

[TheCount]

Not even a bite in Sussex, I sometimes wish I'd stayed in Croydon, my most Exotic girl was from the Phillipenes.

Her name was "Noy", got a bit of stick from the family for it but they are all commoners

Hopefully, if and when I join the Royals I'll get to travel a bit and meet interesting females.

A few mates were round the other night and when I woke up I put on some white track trousers and a skanky old black T-shirt, "are you actually going out like that" was there response, I replied, I could wear a black binbag and still fit in round this Sh!&ole.

Might give you an idea of the standard of people in my town

[JulesB]

Hopefully, if and when I join the Royals I'll get to travel a bit and meet interesting females.

Yeah and Im sure they'll charge you for the privilege of meeting them!!!!

My village is full of weird inbred pikey types!!!! I only live here cos I cant afford a place in the next door village (a mile away) where I grew up! Its far too posh now!!! So much so I have to walk/drive/cycle a mile to my 'local' when theres another pub close enough to see out the front window!

[may18]

I believe Civil unrest is so close that most of us should be able to smell it.

Maybe yours or my community does not currently have these conflicts but it only takes one area to revolt and the rest will follow.

I seriously believe that. you only need to look at some of the comments from people on this forum. Serving/ex serving, proffesional, civil servants all people who I would expect to be Intelligent enough to diffrentiate media hype from reality yet they still believe our country and traditions are being run itno the ground.

I believe in multi cultural societies, it's in my opnion the only way but choosing segregation in a country wether you were born here or not cannot be right in any persons eyes.

I have never seen a white only area, never, only in American films in the apartite period.

I have however read about and seen Asian only areas, I have seen streets in my own neighbourhood where white people cannot walk down for fear of muggins or violence.

I guess i live in a sheltered world in my leafy suburb

Im in favour of a multi cultural britain, i do think though that those settling in britain should at least feel ..some sort of loyalty to britain though. I find it disturbing to see guys like "captain hook" preaching he hates our country, yet living here.

Oh well sorry for being too serious ;p

I just didnt realise people here felt strongly enough about it all for civil disorder to be a genuine possibility

[Chester]

Just look at the sun today



Fake accent was all it took

Sun Man posing as refugee is smuggled into Britain

Beginning of the end ?

[may18]

Now this is from a senior police officer, an article in the telegraph (cracking newspaper).

When its the sun, i ignore t to be honest..murdoch has his own agenda.

But when its a policeman, i tend to respect his experience

______________
The truth about asylum
(Filed: 20/05/2003)


When the elected spokesman for this country's chief constables, Chris Fox, warned at the weekend that "mass migration has brought with it a whole new range … of crime", all hell broke loose.

Most members of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) would consider their president's remarks in the Observer a statement of the obvious. Yet the instinctive hostility of the Guardian, the Independent and the BBC was such that they scarcely troubled to report what Mr Fox had actually said. They preferred to quote the Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes denouncing his "inaccurate and emotive" language and the Refugee Council's accusation that he was "demonising" asylum seekers.

So what did Mr Fox tell the Observer? He did say that, two years ago, the movement of asylum seekers through Sangatte into Britain "reached a high level, a tidal wave", though the flow had lately been reduced. But he added: "It's a healthy situation that we've got lots of different people in different communities, but if you look into some of the cities - looking to the north, Bradford simmers, Blackburn simmers - it does not take much to disturb the balance. We've got to be careful to make sure we're not overwhelming our current infrastructure." Mr Fox told The Daily Telegraph: "This is not about racism. Immigrants are not the cause of crime levels. It's just that they are being exploited."

So Mr Fox was not using emotive language or demonising asylum seekers at all. Yet the organs of the liberal establishment ignore the professional concerns of a decent and respected figure. For them, the story is merely another example of "institutional racism" in the police. Indeed, according to Roy Greenslade of the Guardian, newspapers should not even be permitted freedom to report or comment on the abuse of asylum. He agrees with Article 19, described as "the inter-national organisation which fights censorship and defends people's right to free speech", that "the only practical way of improving the situation is to curtail editors' freedom".

In other words, because the Guardian and its allies cannot face the fact that the collapse of the asylum system has unleashed an unprecedented crime wave on to Britain's streets, other newspapers should be subject to censorship. It is hard to conceive of a more certain way of turning anxiety about asylum seekers into hysteria than to suppress the freedom to report the story. We need more public figures with the courage and outspokenness of Mr Fox. Only if public opinion can be expressed freely and frankly on the asylum issue will the Government be persuaded to act more vigorously
___________

[Rotary Booty]

An Asylum Seeker has sewn up his eyes, ears and mouth as a protest against his treatment in this country.

What's new, we've been getting stitched up for years!

There is a worrying problem though, if he wins his case, how will they be able to tell him?

[Tab]

Well he has won his case but will not unzip the stiches until the Government says sorry and lets a lot more of his pals stay, good ere aint it.

[Guest]

Here no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

Spread the word 'its what we do to them when they arrive'

If the word gets back to Iran, Afghanistan, etc perhaps they'll have second thoughts!

[Midshipman786]

the whole things a racket from top to bottom, everyones involved from fat cat immigration lawyers to truckers that bring them in and the human rights mob. thats where the problem lies. i dont blame the asylum seekers personally, they're just taking what they can get obviously.

[Guest]

786 You are right there of course it's the fat cats taking the cream as usual.

The thing is when I spent 3 tours in W*gland I couldn't wait to get back to dear old blighty, now that I'm here (and so are the w*gs) I can't wait to get back!

[Jason The Argonaut]

An Asylum Seeker has sewn up his eyes, ears and mouth as a protest against his treatment in this country.

What's new, we've been getting stitched up for years!

When I saw this topic on the news I could not believe what I was seeing. I thought you are the most stupid person I have ever seen. That was no way to protest, that was stupidity in its highest form . He could have protest in a completely different way a less painless and less extreme. But he had to go tie his mouth and eyes shut, just so he could get the media attention. You don't see any one else doing stuff like that, every other asylum seeker waits his or her turn.

How dare he blackmail this country into letting him claim asylum in this way. I can't tell you how this one man has enraged me. There are some sick people in this world and they will do the sickest shit you have ever seen just to get there on way.

I personally would have let him be, if he want's to tie up his mouth and eyes let him. If he want's to kill himself let him , it's his choice no one else and he is to blame not Britain's, not Tony's.