Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sat 28 Jul, 2007 12:40 am
by Rogue Chef
It is, but not decreed by me.
And what is the relevance?

"Cult Member" - Isn't that one of the denominations on MFs?
Whatever the case maybe have it your way Frank S.

Posted: Sat 28 Jul, 2007 11:05 am
by La Langosta
I really dont know whats going on :o (and thats nowt to do with alcohol or drugs)

Cheffy...WTF is going on?? Answer via PM or in public, not bothered either way. Just some sort of explanation required. Thanks muchly

Posted: Sat 28 Jul, 2007 11:32 am
by Rogue Chef
As Phil Collins once said "no explanation required' or was that jacket?

Following repeated attempts by Flighty to draw me into discussion about some alleged issues, Artist posted a somewhat condescending message. I have no issues with Flighty, and have nothing to discuss with her. That's not to say that I wouldn't engage in conversation if I ever an appropriate occasion were to arise.

I responded to Artist's post, the rest is an amusing aside aimed at one or two small inconsistencies, but nothing serious.

On a lighter note; it turned out sunny again.

Posted: Sat 28 Jul, 2007 11:53 am
by La Langosta
Thanks for your response both here and on the other thread.

Yes, it has turned out sunny again...but not for very long, well where I am anyway. :(

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 12:18 am
by flighty
You have been picking a fight with me for a good while.

Both on here and Once a Marine.

I have stood my ground and asked you, politely, to address your issues with me via PM.

This is the third time of asking.

Jayne

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 12:30 am
by Artist
I would paste up the rules and regs like you do Steve whenever someone oversteps the mark but quite frankly can't be bothered.

Artist

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 12:58 am
by flighty
Rogue Chef wrote:. I have no issues with Flighty,
Yeah, right. :roll:

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 5:52 am
by Rogue Chef
:) For the sake of clarity - I have not tried to pick a fight with anyone on any site, at anytime. I do not have issues with anyone on any site, not even Frank S. There is no requirement to enter into discussion via PM, as there is nothing of a sensitive nature to discuss; there is nothing to discuss. :)

:) If I have contravened any rules on any site, then I would expect the moderators to address the issue. Alternately a reminder from a fellow member of the site would be acceptable. Rob, on OAMAAM, recently asked me not to post the site regs in response to an incident, as he felt I was doing his job. He stated that he was on the case and would take appropriate action. I explained that it was meant as a lighthearted reminder, but acknowleged that I had been a ‘bit quick off the mark’. In future, if I have any concerns, I will direct them at the site moderators. :)

:) I generally steer away from using abusive or foul language of any sort. However, the other night, I made a rare exception and immediately posted a bollocking to myself in w@#k of the week. I could have just deleted or edited the posts, but that would have detracted from the point. :)

:) Neither Artist nor Flighty are shy when it comes to colourful discussion and both can 'dish it out in spades', when they want to. That's fine and adds to the charracter of these forums, but they shouldn't complain if they get a bit coming back at them, real or perceived. :)

:) One last thing, when addressing me on open forum, please use my correct title 'Mr Rogue Chef'. :)

:) Finally, I would appreciate it if someone would proof read this for me to check for errors in spelling and grammar. :)

:wink: And to finish with. Loz,
I think I'm getting the hang of those little yellow men. :wink:

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 7:30 am
by Frank S.
Much ado about nothing, I agree. 8)
I mean really about nothing....

Do I get cross-thread bonuses for posting this proverb, I wonder?:
the dog barks, but the caravan rolls on.

Posted: Sun 29 Jul, 2007 9:41 am
by Rogue Chef
Absolutely! And extra bonus points for the most obscure proverb in the world and a bit of Bill the Bard.