Well said and i totally agree, i have not once seen Steven Preece react angrily or abusively in the face of a fair few negative comments made by others towards him. He has mostly avoided confronatation and seems mostly to just justify his reasons for writing his book and defended himself when others have questions him.anglo-saxon wrote:I don't know Steven Preece. Couldn't pick him out in a line-up. I haven't read his book/s and I'm probably not likely to. I don't know what he's like or how he conducts his life - quite franlkly, I couldn't give a toss.
What I do know is that on these forums he has been a calm poster and a gent, even in the face of many petty, infantile personal attacks. He's the only poster on here who hasn't responded in kind to such negativity. If that says anything about him, then it's all good as far as I'm concerned.
So he's flogging his book. Who cares FFS? People can post personal web sites on here that may or may not be flogging stuff. So what?
The slaggings issued on here say far more about the sender than the receiver!
Sum up and give the guy a break FFS!
I think everyone is bored of the arguments (legitimate or not) that arose originally from his book being released and nothing more can be added to that, its been done to death. So if you dont like his books then dont buy them, i dont see why people still feel a need to comment on them, its all been said and debated before.