Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed 21 Apr, 2004 8:28 pm
Blair has effected a U-turn in his EU policy by announcing his intent to hold a national referendum on the issue. The first EU referendum in 1975 was the first national plebicite in Bristish political history and was designed to clarify the UK's standpoint.
Blair's u-turn: http://www.eubusiness.com/afp/040420232040.h9ir13t0
Tories' attempt to force a referendum: http://www.eubusiness.com/afp/031008154002.ls2in43k
This gives some interesteing history from the early 60's to the present: http://www.euro-know.org/dictionary/u.h ... KandEurope
A good guide to all things EU-ish: http://www.euro-know.org/dictionary/index.html
I'd be interested to hear people's opinions on this topic.
Posted: Wed 21 Apr, 2004 8:40 pm
He's as greasy as a greased weasel, and as trustworthy.
Bin Brussels, bin the EU and let us get on with life before Ted Heath.
Posted: Wed 21 Apr, 2004 8:44 pm
I agree, I'll believe a referendum after it's held.
Quote from first linked article:
"Blair -- who managed to make his announcement without once uttering the word "referendum" -- failed to say when exactly it would be held, or what the question might be. "
Posted: Wed 21 Apr, 2004 11:23 pm
Posted: Thu 22 Apr, 2004 7:25 am
Indeed B Liar is sneaky, he knows what he is up to. As Tab says if one of the other countries rejects the Constitution in a Referendum vote it's a dead duck anyway.
Did anyone notice Blair at the dispatch box yesterday say if there was a NO vote he would do like Ireland did, vote again until they get the right decision!
It's up to all of us to send a message to the Princess in June at the Euro elections, I have never voted at a Euro Election before as I have never believed in it, however I intend to send my message to this dictator.
Posted: Thu 22 Apr, 2004 9:16 am
Blair is a lying toe rag, the chances are he wont be in charge of labour come the time of a referendum and his succesor will bin the idea anyway. If we are going to have one lets have it as soon as the constitution is agreed in June. Stuff letting parliament debate it for six months so that joe public gets bored sick of it and doesnt bother to vote.
The European Constitution will try to do away with 2000 years of individual nation states and create a new soviet style country. JUST SAY NO.
Posted: Thu 22 Apr, 2004 10:07 am
I think some of the last words in our tones speach were a pearler
We Will debate and Decide, and Then have a Referendum
i think we all know what the outcome will be already, but we can, and should make a difference, and thats next year at the General Erections, (yes i know, its meant to be) so lets vote the FCUKers out.
to blair and the Labourites.......................where is our maggie? she had more balls than this cult will ever have.
Posted: Thu 22 Apr, 2004 2:53 pm
I am not in support of Labour, I like to think of myself as being a Tory 'believer' however, the comments that have been posted are a bit OTT.
Blair is a bit of a nobber, but then I trust Blair far more than the Tories at the moment due to the unstability. When another party comes with strong, defined leadership I will think otherwise.
Posted: Thu 22 Apr, 2004 4:14 pm
bootneck wrote:where is our maggie? she had more balls than this cult will ever have.
Bingo! That's the kind of leadership that Britain deserves. I was never so proud of my country as when Maggie was boss.
She kicked Argie arse, told Ronnie Reagan to piss off and mind his own business (even though they were good friends), and squished that commie traitor Scargil like a bug. I recall us having a little celebratory dinner at our checkpoint in Cyprus when we heard the miners were no longer holding the country to ransom.
Sure, some of her decisions were a bit iffy, but what leader gets it right all the time. Overall, I'd say she even gave Churchil a run for his money.
I remember when the Tories all stabbed her in the back after poll tax fiasco. I was already in Canada and remember feeling quite saddenned that they could have been so disloyal to such a great leader. That John Major was chinless, spineless twerp and ruined so much of what maggie achieved. He owns much of the blame for the current regime even being in power in my opinion.
Blair is positively reptilian. Surely the British public hasn't become so gullible as to swallow his drivel?
Posted: Fri 23 Apr, 2004 5:15 am
saffer wrote:When another party comes with strong, defined leadership I will think otherwise.
Its a Shame Screaming Lord Such
is brown Bread, at least you knew you were getting a looney.
AS, well said, i was at RM deal when the miners strike was on, and although they were on strike, on my daily visit to the Admiral Keppel public house, there were a few miners in there who were backing the horses, and would think nothing of loosing £200-£400 in a DTS.
Posted: Wed 05 May, 2004 1:10 pm
I think people are under-estimating the power of propoganda
In 75 we were fed a diet of lies and propoganda
and strong "No" voting feeling was moved to a "Yes" vote.
Only the difference this time is whereas in 75 MPS could campaign according to their conscience. This time lord blair has decreed labour mps cant vote no.
One way or another we are going into a united states of europe wile blair is in power guys...