I totally agree Doc. Thats why I would rather take a Infantryman who as got a OP tour under his belt rather than a lad straight out of RM training. And its not me who always harps on about how long your training is compared to the Infantry. But what really grips my sh*t is this assumption that the 26 weeks Army Infantry Training is somehow crap and doesnt produce decent soldiers. Yes I agree there is a ethos the RMs drill into there lads in training. But so do the Guards, the Paras, Light Infantry who are now the Rifles. And I will say it again, the Rifles dont wear Blue berets anyway, they wear GREEN and always have.HCR, I dont think you can judge a mans elitism by the duration of training, its the quality. Of the training and the man.
My own training was 8 weeks at HMS Raleigh, 52 weeks at RNMSS Haslar, 26 weeks at CTCRM and a further 4 months on the job training at a unit sickbay before being able to deploy. So thats 102 weeks, and puts your rifles plus AACC quote back up your hoop sideways.
But what gets me is when I hear comments like "the Rifles lads will be down town telling the Girls there are RMs" that f*cking winds me up big time. There all ex Light Infantry, they consider them selfs the best. They are proud to be Rifles and show a arogance similar to the Paras and Guards that they are better than the rest. I just recently got back from Iraq with 4 rifles and there is noway they will go round town pretending they are Royal Marines. THERE IS NO WAY A LAD IN THE RIFLES WILL EVER PRETEND TO BE IN THE ROYAL MARINES INFACT THERE IS NO WAY ANYONE IN THE BRITISH ARMY WILL EVER CLAIM TO BE IN THE ROYAL NAVY BELEIVE ME.