Page 1 of 1
Infantrykit.com
Posted: Sun 10 Feb, 2008 11:25 pm
by jamie856uk
Hi all,
Infantrykit.com has extended its range vastly over the last few months and we are now establishing ourselves amongst the uk market. My reason for this post is that we have recently supplied two British army units with major orders prior to operational deployment which they received 10% discount for bulk orders. If you would like any further information then please visit
www.infantrykit.com or email
info@infantrykit.com
Kind Regards
James Walters
Managing Director
Infantrykit.com
Run by ex-soldiers for soldiers
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 6:38 am
by Tartan_Terrier
I could be mistaken, but judging by the photos on your site pretty much all of the webbing, vests, rucksacks etc are made by Webtex.
Webtex gear has a rather bad name due to quality/durability issues. Can't you source better stuff?
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 11:16 am
by jamie856uk
Hi,
I would say that most of our vests are webtex and pouches are webtex and I am aware that webtex has a mixed reaction amongst the army. Talking from past experience I used their products throughout my army career including tours. The main reason we stock this stuff is because I believe the average private cant afford expensive gear like arktiks and I think webtex is very reasonably priced. We do tend to sell a lot of this brand and havnt had any issues with it however Im always open to suggestions on how we could improve! Any suggestions? Thanks.
Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 3:41 pm
by harry hackedoff
58 Patern
Oi luvsit

Posted: Mon 11 Feb, 2008 4:58 pm
by Sticky Blue
58 or G1098? Ohhhh pass the andrex lofty

I love the smell of damp webbing, on someone else!
Posted: Tue 12 Feb, 2008 2:51 pm
by harry hackedoff
Nothing looks better on a woman, than a Bootneck wearing 58 pattern, S6 respirator , high legs and nowt else
`Scuse me for a minute, I think someones at the door or summat
A ha A ha A ha A ha, ooh, A oohh, A hoooh, ah, get yer legs on me kidney pouches aaarrrrrroooogghohoarrr

Posted: Tue 12 Feb, 2008 8:01 pm
by Artist
Once trialed this ere Nylon stuff whilst in 40 in the early seventies. Was nice n comfy, and was a bit like a string vest with a zip up the front, All of us were well impressed right up until we did Absailing of the Dewerstone come the last day of the three week trial.................First one off the top ended up being lost in smoke as the nylon melted and caught fire on the way down.
Keen young man from the MOD at the end of the trial asked what we thought of it. The man was given a pile of melted nylon still reeking of burning and was informed that best they rethink the entire idea ASAP! For once Pusser took the advice of those at the pointed end and binned it ASAP.
Artist
Posted: Wed 13 Feb, 2008 3:50 pm
by harry hackedoff
Ste,
We had some of that shit and a similar vest in dpm cotton. One size doesn`t fit all and the old 58 was very adaptable to the individual. Mine fit like a glove.
Which was shit mate, because it was supposed to go on me back
But you know what I mean, 58 was easy to fit and did a great job at the time.
Pusser saw that 58 would eventually die a death once SA 80 came in and the issue of decent bergans. The idea was to sack CEFO/Belt Order and carry the same gear under body armour or under a mega chacon. Don`t know what today`s bloke thinks of the chest rig or even better, what guys who were trained on 58 think of the chest rig?
I shall ask

Posted: Wed 20 Feb, 2008 8:49 pm
by yimmin
Good site & good prices
Posted: Wed 20 Feb, 2008 11:53 pm
by anglo-saxon
Pics on the site are too bloddy small.
I went from Brit '58 pattern, to Canadian '82 pattern (utter shyte - ended up using an '82 pattern belt and harness, but with Brit '58 pattern waterbottle and Armalite pouches, plus a 58 SLR mag pouch on the right for the radio).
This is what we wear now:
http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/Chief_Land ... 811_e.asp# (cursor over the pockets to see what goes where if it tickles your fancy).
Not sold on it, personally. It gets bloody hot. I prefer belt kit.