Page 1 of 1

People in charge...

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 5:09 pm
by Frank S.
Well that's interesting.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.w ... index.html

Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs

Image

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.

The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne.

"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne. "(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press."

The Air Force has paid for research into nonlethal weapons, but he said the service is unlikely to spend more money on development until injury problems are reviewed by medical experts and resolved.

Nonlethal weapons generally can weaken people if they are hit with the beam. Some of the weapons can emit short, intense energy pulses that also can be effective in disabling some electronic devices.

On another subject, Wynne said he expects to choose a new contractor for the next generation aerial refueling tankers by next summer. He said a draft request for bids will be put out next month, and there are two qualified bidders: the Boeing Co. and a team of Northrop Grumman Corp. and European Aeronautic Defence and Space Co., the majority owner of European jet maker Airbus SAS.

The contract is expected to be worth at least $20 billion (€15.75 billion).

Chicago, Illinois-based Boeing lost the tanker deal in 2004 amid revelations that it had hired a top Air Force acquisitions official who had given the company preferential treatment.

Wynne also said the Air Force, which is already chopping 40,000 active duty, civilian and reserves jobs, is now struggling to find new ways to slash about $1.8 billion (€1.4 billion) from its budget to cover costs from the latest round of base closings.

He said he can't cut more people, and it would not be wise to take funding from military programs that are needed to protect the country. But he said he also incurs resistance when he tries to save money on operations and maintenance by retiring aging aircraft.

"We're finding out that those are, unfortunately, prized possessions of some congressional districts," said Wynne, adding that the Air Force will have to "take some appetite suppressant pills." He said he has asked employees to look for efficiencies in their offices.

The base closings initially were expected to create savings by reducing Air Force infrastructure by 24 percent.

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 5:16 pm
by Tam527
How about testing them in places where someone is already being punished. ie a prison riot situation.

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 5:29 pm
by Frank S.
Image

Yeah, but... No but... Yeah but..., No but.... That might make sense, but no because what happened was was I was going round Karl’s but then this whole fing happened because Shelley Todd who’s a bitch anyway has been completely going around saying that Destiny stole money out of Rochelle’s purse but I ain’t never not even spoken to Rochelle ‘cause she flicked ash into Michaela’s hair. Because what happened was was this whole fing happened what I don’t even know nuffin about because Ashley Cramer has been going around saying that Samantha’s brother smells of mud but anyway shut up I ain’t never even stole no car so shut up.


Awww fark it.

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 5:33 pm
by Tam527
People in charge, eh......moderators :roll:

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 5:37 pm
by Frank S.
The point is the whole idea is non-sensical, likely to be unconstitutional even.
The mind boggles, but then there's so many of those hare-brained schemes floating about in supposedly serious circles, what can you do but laugh?

Posted: Wed 13 Sep, 2006 6:48 pm
by BigStevie
As part of a round of cost-cutting measures, laughing has been disallowed until further notice.

Posted: Fri 15 Sep, 2006 3:56 am
by Kiwi1988
Arrh "little Britian" I know that show well, thank christ for pay TV, so I don't have to watch that sh*t .....oh I mean quality British TV programming :wink:

Posted: Fri 15 Sep, 2006 8:27 am
by Tam527
You were right the first time Kiwi. :wink: Quality and British TV are a contradiction in terms.

Posted: Fri 15 Sep, 2006 3:50 pm
by Mrs. Frank S.
Tam527 wrote:You were right the first time Kiwi. :wink: Quality and British TV are a contradiction in terms.
Nah, Quality and American TV are the contradiction in terms. 8)

As a disclaimer, we do NOT have cable or satelite. Most of what we watch comes from Netflix. :D

Julie