Posted: Fri 16 Mar, 2007 11:38 am
nope most just do BPC
MilitaryForums.co.uk
The UK's No'1 Military Forum
http://www.militaryforums.co.uk/forums/
No jumps for Paras as MoD cuts £1bn
http://www.militaryforums.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=33797
Page 4 of 4
Posted: Thu 12 Apr, 2007 2:25 pm
Jumped last month
Posted: Thu 12 Apr, 2007 3:57 pm
I think this idea is the most stupid idea ever and i no lots of stupid people 
they cannot be serious about stopping the parachute training but like some people say it isnt true and i belive them. But if they do stop parachute training will recruits in p coys still have to do the Trainasium Areal Confidence Course or will that be binned to ( if it turns out to be true ).
they cannot be serious about stopping the parachute training but like some people say it isnt true and i belive them. But if they do stop parachute training will recruits in p coys still have to do the Trainasium Areal Confidence Course or will that be binned to ( if it turns out to be true ).Posted: Fri 13 Apr, 2007 2:29 am
Just thought id add this that i found out about early today. The MOD is supposedly shelling out 3 billion to build 2 aircraft hanggers. i thought they were trying to save money but cutting parachuting but it seams they have plently of money to spend else ware. F**K air craft carriers.
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid ... =496092007
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid ... =496092007
Posted: Fri 13 Apr, 2007 7:09 am
Sorry, but Aircraft Carriers are vital for any serious force projection and you can't say it's either this or that, because we need both.
Posted: Fri 13 Apr, 2007 3:10 pm
Ok i no i shouldnt have said that but it annoys me we also need a parachute regiment though.
Posted: Fri 13 Apr, 2007 3:49 pm
We still do.