Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed 11 Feb, 2004 8:34 pm
by Sisyphus
Sticky Blue wrote:I was 104.5 when taken into sickbay with heat exhaustion on my juniors (cheers Sgt Maj, you saved my bacon!).

Core temp was taken with a rectal thermometer, nowt like string and knots! :
Sticky

Damn reckless of you, suh. Those porkers can be dangerous. Sheep are safer and far more attractive. :lol:

Rectal thermometer, huh? Explain please! Aural thermometers seem to the thing of the moment. Er, that's AUral, not Oral! :-?

Posted: Wed 11 Feb, 2004 11:19 pm
by Tab
Some was saying that there is two minutes difference between 23,59 hrs
and 00:01 hrs. May I ask what happened to the seconds, like 23:59.59seconds and 00:00.01 seconds.

:drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking: :drinking:

Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2004 2:11 am
by anglo-saxon
Not wishing to appear picky, but it should actually be a colon between the "59" and the "59", not a ".", as in 23:59:59.

Bored? Yeah, you could say that!

Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2004 11:53 am
by Sisyphus
Tab wrote:May I ask what happened to the seconds, like 23:59.59seconds and 00:00.01 seconds.
Tab

Damn the invention of digital watches! Or even watches with second hands. Seems we live life by the second these days. I guess in the general scheme of things the question doesn't matter except to quantum physicists. Oh, and 'A' type personalities! 8)

Remember the days when Plymouth had a different 'time' than London because the sun rose and set at different times? Advent of the railways meant things had to be synchronized.

It's been downhill ever since. :-?

Posted: Thu 12 Feb, 2004 2:19 pm
by druadan
It wasn't the seconds, I think I said does 2359 last 120 seconds instead of the normal 60 (or something like that). I assumed that if the military don't use 0000, then they don't use any of the seconds in that minute either ie 0000:01 etc