Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon 19 Sep, 2005 5:46 pm
by GGHT
I just bought a pair of Brooks Adrenalin which are a cracking shoe, stable for us overpronators but still light, with excellent grip, as I am having orthotics made though im going to have to buy ANOTHER pair of "neutrals" so thats another £60 from the coffers...
Posted: Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:19 pm
by megadevil
so which of them shud i buy for running on a track then
Posted: Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:20 pm
by megadevil
what are orthotics and neutrals
Posted: Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:41 pm
by Dave.Mil
gone
Posted: Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:53 pm
by flynn101
Ive got a pair of PT-03's
so far there the only trainers ive had that havent fallen apart in a few months
Bad thing is UK Gear look like a market store label
Posted: Wed 28 Sep, 2005 11:17 am
by dalo
I liek the moon boots i have at the moment thankyou, but i would give them a blast.
Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2005 12:07 pm
by SO19
Just picked up a pair of the PT-03's....
I'll have to see how they perform, but first impressions are good. Very comfortable.
Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2005 4:55 pm
by letsrole
I think i'll stick with my £12 running shoes thanks! They are actully ok, I got them when I went over to America and bought them in this dodgy cheap warehouse thing, and touch wood no shin splints or problems
yet and have been using them since april. But they seem ok and have cushion and all that good stuff
Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2005 8:31 pm
by dalo
I think i will stick to my £30 reeboks from M&M magazine for now until i have an income.