Page 2 of 5
Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:08 pm
by tafmad
Artist wrote:Take this as read all you Walters out there. You will in time be sussed by those who know better.
So, keep a low profile and once you think you have sussed out the Screed then naff off to a website where sad bassas like yourself can take part in all that
LA LA LAND SHITE which makes your totally useless life's worth living.
I am not a Moderator. I am just a guy who served as a Royal Marines Commando and to be honest am getting fed up with some of the crap that seems to appear here from Eijuts who would not know a bayonet from a fecking tuning fork!
You know who you are so watch it. OK?
Nothing worse than a poster having a rant about walts then telling the world they are RM, sort of a double walt walt
Artist
Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:18 pm
by Frank S.
tafmad wrote:
Nothing worse than a poster having a rant about walts then telling the world they are RM, sort of a double walt walt
Perhaps you've missed on what led him to post this.
Artist's been a member here long enough for most to know who he is and what he's done, yet some nobbers still manage to question him (as they do other BTDTs) and reply with complete disrespect.
I don't know you but this above post of yours was stupid to make.
Do wind your neck in.
Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:31 pm
by tafmad
Frank S. wrote:tafmad wrote:
Nothing worse than a poster having a rant about walts then telling the world they are RM, sort of a double walt walt
Perhaps you've missed on what led him to post this.
Artist's been a member here long enough for most to know who he is and what he's done, yet some nobbers still manage to question him (as they do other BTDTs) and reply with complete disrespect.
I don't know you but this above post of yours was stupid to make.
Do wind your neck in.
1. So because some is a long time poster he is sacrosacnt?
2. And his posts not allowed to be questioned?
3. Complete disrespect, should have I saluted?
4. Are you his PA?
Necks ..winding in?

Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:36 pm
by Frank S.
tafmad wrote:
1. So because some is a long time poster he is sacrosacnt?
2. And his posts not allowed to be questioned?
3. Complete disrespect, should have I saluted?
4. Are you his PA?
Necks ..winding in?

Your words, mate: "sort of a double walt walt". You can modify or retract, your choice.
There is no questioning the content nor the intent of his post. Like I said: "perhaps" you missed on all that led to his starting this thread, but the implication of your phrase quoted above
cannot stand.
Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:47 pm
by tafmad
Frank S. wrote:tafmad wrote:
1. So because some is a long time poster he is sacrosacnt?
2. And his posts not allowed to be questioned?
3. Complete disrespect, should have I saluted?
4. Are you his PA?
Necks ..winding in?

Your words, mate: "sort of a double walt walt". You can modify or retract, your choice.
There is no questioning the content nor the intent of his post. Like I said: "perhaps" you missed on all that led to his starting this thread, but the implication of your phrase quoted above
cannot stand.
Oh! let me see if I have this right. It is ok to post and threaten anyone who in the eyes of the poster is a walt

But, you must not question the poster who, it would seem to a newbie like me is protesting quite loudly from the safety of his bedroom?
But hey! please feel free to delete my post if it is upsetting you.
Re: A warning to Walts
Posted: Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:57 pm
by Frank S.
tafmad wrote:
But hey! please feel free to delete my post if it is upsetting you.
No, I would not deprive you of this opportunity to either delete or modify your post. Do some more research on the parties involved before shooting from the hip. Because that is what you did.
You'll know you got me upset once you get a first warning from me.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Just look a bit deeper into it. Safety of his bedroom? Threaten someone who in his eyes is a walt?
The man who was the reason behind this thread IS A WALT and in MY opinion, worse.
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 8:46 am
by Tam527
Tafmad,
I am also a comparative newcomer to the forum. Frank and Artist are established and well respected members of the forum, so I listen to their views on matters that are posted.
This thread in particular is quite apt in that lately a lot of young lads and lassies register here to obtain free advice on matters military, whereby members are only to happy to help if they can.
With this in mind, the reason for this thread is Artist's timely reminder that walts or nobbers on the forum stifle debate and generally mislead people to the point where it descends into argument, which isn't helpful to anyone.
Now, some would say, given my profile(not exactly one of the nations finest)...'What the f**k would you know Tam'.... maybe so. Call me a walt or a nobber if you like, it's your call.
I just wish I had this kind of resource available to me when I was joining up.
Tam.
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 10:38 am
by Artist
At no time did I mention any names in my intital post. But I meant what I said. I wrapped with MF&T a few weeks ago due to the influx of Eijuts posting dangerous and stupid Advice to the wannerbies.
Just lately a few have started to do the same here and it ain't welcome as it just opens a can of worms that creates aggro.
Taffmad fill you boots ref abuse. Water off a ducks arse as far as I'm concerned. Silly Billies are always there ready and waiting to have a pop at other people from the safety of a Keyboard.
Most are guttless little nonentities who's claim to fame is normally along the lines of "I've read all the Andy McNob books so know what I'm talking about" variety.
Just have a look at my website Taffmad. Tells you where you can meet me on any given Saturday, even gives my mobile number. So come and have a chat sometime. There, an open invite to meet me, gosh are'nt I nice then? Oh and my Putors in the dining room in point of fact.
Artist
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 11:53 am
by Rogue Chef
Ahoy there!
Tam527 wrote:
Frank and Artist are established and well respected members of the forum
I wouldn't go that far.
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 3:08 pm
by tafmad
My goodness!!!!!

It would seem that I have upset you all.

Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 4:10 pm
by Frank S.
Plenty of time to think about what was said and redress.
You choose not to.
This is your first warning.
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 4:29 pm
by tafmad
Yes Frank..

I am sorry.. this is a very nice site with very nice posters, posting very nice posts about very nice stuff. In future I wil be a very nice poster and post very nice stuff too.
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 4:29 pm
by harry hackedoff
You haven`t upset anyone, you`ve shown yourself to a right celt though.
If this forum upsets you so much, why stick around

Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 6:50 pm
by tafmad
harry hackedoff wrote:You haven`t upset anyone, you`ve shown yourself to a right celt though.
If this forum upsets you so much, why stick around

Hang about Harry, where have I said I was upset.
I do get a little tired reading about the walt anti walt posts. First we have a poster, normally SF making either a complaint/threat about a walt or walts in general. Then we have the obligatory support messages from the back slappers, which then generates messages about fat guys in pubs wearing combats that a poster bumped into. Fat guys are then ousted and the details posted. It has become a cottage industry. We have heard it all before, same stories nearly every day...It has become so boring..know what I mean Harry?
Posted: Tue 29 Aug, 2006 7:06 pm
by Frank S.
Not quite as boring as getting PMs asking all sorts of completely bone questions, often degenerating in the nobber either gobbing off or even threatening the member they chose to "harrass".
There's a lot more than appears on the threads.
Once again, you say "Nothing worse than a poster having a rant about walts then telling the world they are RM, sort of a double walt walt".
Well guess what: there is worse. And I submit to you that there are idiots who choose to address serving or retired Bootnecks and SF personnel rather than Army/Navy personnel, asking questions such as "how does it feel to kill someone?"
So why should BTDTs bother posting here? to banter with oppos and provide guidance and advice to younger members with a genuine desire to join the forces.
Not to have absolute prongs try to get under their skin.
You may find "rants" against walts and nobbers boring, but you have no clue how far they can go in their harrassing tactics. As a mod, I'm not standing by to see people like Artist get this kind of abuse, period.
Take your "back slappers" comment and sit on it.
Is that clear to you now?