Page 8 of 11
Posted: Wed 24 Sep, 2003 10:08 am
by BenP
Although I feel that it is a shame that it has come to this I do agree with al of the points raised. One thing I would like to be considered is that although there is a wealth of experience on this site, often people (wannabes like me) benefit from realising that there are people who have none. It’s a lonely decision to make to join the armed forces. Very few of your mates are interested and you rarely meet people in the same position as you. I was desperate to find out if other people were doing through the same gamut of emotions as me and if I was doing the right thing. If you take away the opportunity for wannabes to share their experiences, I think this site will lose a lot of its magic. We can often help each other with up to date information and new developments that the more experienced members may not be aware of. Perhaps having a Wannabes only section annexed from the main area may stop the rot and rejuvenate the faith in the exasperated wiser gathering and would benefit both sides.
To reiterate, I understand the move and think that £5 is a absolute bargain for the wealth the be gleaned, but don’t cut off your nose to spite your face. Just an opinion, not a provocation.
Posted: Sun 28 Sep, 2003 4:29 pm
by max
As a new member of the forums (though I have been reading them for a while) I have to say I haven't really experienced the problems mentioned to any great degree so my comments may not be entirely accurate...
As far as a public and private forum goes I would certainly be happy to pay £5 or whatever to join but I do think bishamten has a very valid point about the forums as a source of information for many people. In addition I'd agree with bishamten's point about limiting access potentially limiting opinions and thus maybe even limiting the forums and this is something you'd have to keep an eye on I guess...
Having said this, if the problems are getting bad enough to be causing responsible members to leave then obviously something needs to be done.
With this in mind, and in the spirit of compromise suggested by Archie, I'd like to add a further suggestion for consideration...
Much of the most useful information on many varying topics often appears in posts not necessarily in the correct forums or under obvious titles. Perhaps you could have a split situation with some public and some private forums but at the same time allow all the boards to be publicly viewable and searchable. In this way new users seeking information could have access to the wealth of experience available on the boards and would hopefully be encouraged to join them and participate responsibly.
But then it's only my opinion and as I said earlier I may not be in full possession of the facts; in the end I'll trust the moderators to make the right decision...
Posted: Mon 29 Sep, 2003 12:14 am
by Wholley
Max,
Trust the moderaters?Are you Insane?
Their all Bootnecks
Nuff said.

Posted: Fri 10 Oct, 2003 1:01 pm
by ExCrabMate
I think that Archie's idea is good and given the recent rash of knobbers, the sooner it is implemented, the better. I'd pay £10 a year.
in or out
Posted: Sat 08 Nov, 2003 12:06 am
by mutley2002
Sisyphus wrote:I shall be walking through the "Ayes" lobby!
But El Prez, where are those 'interesting and intelligent' threads you were talking about??
Only one query - about how you decide who's in and who's out? Just ex Royals/svcfolk in? Whatabout the valuable contributions from some of the 'non-combatants?
Sorry, I'm sure you're on the case!!
oh dont exclude us ex qaranc people and us who help the lads over the seas in iraq etc please dont cut the cord on us we want to stay

you never know when you might need us

Posted: Tue 18 Nov, 2003 7:57 pm
by Deniable_Operative
exclusively available to everyone.
looks good on paper.
filtering out relevance though, tricky...
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 5:23 pm
by grayberet
On Board! If MOST see this need.....And THANKS for being online.
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 5:49 pm
by Aldo
Sorry I haven't read the whole post but is the £10/£5 fee still going ahead or what?
I don't mind as long as someone tells me before it goes ahead (just so I don't think you all don't like me and kicked me out

)
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 6:40 pm
by anglo-saxon
£5.00? Holy crap, that's over 12 Canadian pesos!
Yeah, sure, if you'll have me. I haven't been around this site long, but it's growing on me.
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 7:24 pm
by Aldo
I just thought of a different system, how about just allowing members who've reached a certain member level thing, say you can only go into certain parts of the forum if you have a "member" status level? Just incase you can't figure out or it's just too much hassle to use the pay systems.
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 7:40 pm
by Frank S.
Can o'worms. Then we'd get into the "quantity" versus "quality" of posts.
Posted: Thu 05 Feb, 2004 8:15 pm
by Aldo
Good point. So when do we get to know if it's going ahead?
Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2004 12:09 am
by Wholley
It already has.
THE BUNKER.
Wholley.

Posted: Fri 06 Feb, 2004 12:55 am
by Aldo
You don't have to pay to get in there though, do you?
Posted: Mon 09 Feb, 2004 1:49 pm
by Jason The Argonaut
How about splitting the site in two. One side would be for people looking to join the armed services and civvies. Then the other side would be for serving and ex-serving members of the armed service including TA soldiers. The ex an serving members could post on both sides, there for there would be no need to charge.
